D S Lü1, Y Shono, I Oda, K Abumi, K Kaneda. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The biomechanical effects of chondroitinase ABC and chymopapain related to spinal segmental instability were investigated using a canine model, as well by as radiologic and histologic analyses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical, radiologic, and histologic affects on the lumber intervertebral disc of chondroitinase ABC compared with chymopapain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No study on the biomechanical effects of chondroitinase ABC has been reported. METHODS: Forty-eight lumbar intervertebral discs in eight beagles were randomly assigned to three groups and received one of three materials: chondroitinase ABC, chymopapain, or buffered saline, using a lateral percutaneous procedure. One week after injection, the animals were killed and the lumbar spinal motion segments were removed. Spinal segmental instability after chemonucleolysis was evaluated in spinal motion segments without posterior elements. Radiologic and histologic changes were also investigated. RESULTS: Spinal segmental instability and disc space narrowing were more greater in the chymopapain group than in the chondroitinase ABC group. Destruction of nucleus and anulus proteoglycans, indicated by loss of safranin-O staining, was less intense in chondroitinase ABC-injected discs. CONCLUSIONS: Chondroitinase ABC results in less spinal segmental instability, disc space narrowing, and destruction of proteoglycans in intervertebral disc matrix than chymopapain.
STUDY DESIGN: The biomechanical effects of chondroitinase ABC and chymopapain related to spinal segmental instability were investigated using a canine model, as well by as radiologic and histologic analyses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical, radiologic, and histologic affects on the lumber intervertebral disc of chondroitinase ABC compared with chymopapain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No study on the biomechanical effects of chondroitinase ABC has been reported. METHODS: Forty-eight lumbar intervertebral discs in eight beagles were randomly assigned to three groups and received one of three materials: chondroitinase ABC, chymopapain, or buffered saline, using a lateral percutaneous procedure. One week after injection, the animals were killed and the lumbar spinal motion segments were removed. Spinal segmental instability after chemonucleolysis was evaluated in spinal motion segments without posterior elements. Radiologic and histologic changes were also investigated. RESULTS: Spinal segmental instability and disc space narrowing were more greater in the chymopapain group than in the chondroitinase ABC group. Destruction of nucleus and anulus proteoglycans, indicated by loss of safranin-O staining, was less intense in chondroitinase ABC-injected discs. CONCLUSIONS: Chondroitinase ABC results in less spinal segmental instability, disc space narrowing, and destruction of proteoglycans in intervertebral disc matrix than chymopapain.
Authors: Ganjun Feng; Zhanpeng Zhang; Xiaobing Jin; Jiang Hu; Melanie J Gupte; Jeremy M Holzwarth; Peter X Ma Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Nam Vo; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Andria Robinson; Gwendolyn Sowa; Douglas Bentley; Lauren Taylor; Rebecca Studer; Arvydas Usas; Johnny Huard; Sean Alber; Simon C Watkins; Joon Lee; Paulo Coehlo; Dong Wang; Mattia Loppini; Paul D Robbins; Laura J Niedernhofer; James Kang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Peter Grunert; Katherine D Hudson; Michael R Macielak; Eric Aronowitz; Brandon H Borde; Marjan Alimi; Innocent Njoku; Douglas Ballon; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Lawrence J Bonassar; Roger Härtl Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Benjamin Gantenbein; Svenja Illien-Jünger; Samantha C W Chan; Jochen Walser; Lisbet Haglund; Stephen J Ferguson; James C Iatridis; Sibylle Grad Journal: Curr Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: S E Gullbrand; N R Malhotra; T P Schaer; Z Zawacki; J T Martin; J R Bendigo; A H Milby; G R Dodge; E J Vresilovic; D M Elliott; R L Mauck; L J Smith Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 6.576