Literature DB >> 9279743

Existential autonomy: why patients should make their own choices.

H Madder1.   

Abstract

Savulescu has recently introduced the "rational non-interventional paternalist" model of the patient-doctor relationship. This paper addresses objections to such a model from the perspective of an anaesthetist. Patients need to make their own decisions if they are to be fully autonomous. Rational non-interventional paternalism undermines the importance of patient choice and so threatens autonomy. Doctors should provide an evaluative judgment of the best medical course of action, but ought to restrict themselves to helping patients to make their own choices rather than making such choices for them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9279743      PMCID: PMC1377270          DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.4.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Two challenges to the double effect doctrine: euthanasia and abortion.

Authors:  A B Shaw
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Health-related internet use by lupus patients in southern Spain.

Authors:  José-Luis Callejas-Rubio; Raquel Ríos-Fernández; Ana-Celia Barnosi-Marín; Francisco-José García-Hernández; José-Antonio Vargas-Hitos; María-Teresa Camps-García; José-Antonio González-Nieto; Julio Sánchez-Román; Juan Jiménez-Alonso; Enrique de Ramón Garrido; Norberto Ortego-Centeno; Norberto Otego-Centeno
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's rights.

Authors:  D Malyon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Do patients have duties?

Authors:  H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country.

Authors:  Lucija Murgic; Philip C Hébert; Slavica Sovic; Gordana Pavlekovic
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chloe Romanis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-12

8.  Doctors as Appointed Fiduciaries: A Supplemental Model for Medical Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ben Davies; Joshua Parker
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.