Literature DB >> 9279618

Participation bias in a sexuality survey: psychological and behavioural characteristics of responders and non-responders.

M P Dunne1, N G Martin, J M Bailey, A C Heath, K K Bucholz, P A Madden, D J Statham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies of sexual attitudes and behaviour have quantified the direction and magnitude of participation bias, primarily because information on non-responders is difficult to obtain in cross-sectional surveys.
METHOD: Australian adult twins (n = 9112) aged 17-52 years enrolled in a national, longitudinal research register were asked to participate in a postal survey concerning their sexual behaviour and attitudes. Individual consent was determined by separate return of a consent form; 27% explicitly refused, 19% initially agreed to receive a questionnaire, but subsequently did not return consent forms and 52% explicitly consented. Participation data were matched to social, psychological and behavioural information in a longitudinal data set.
RESULTS: People who explicitly consented had higher levels of education, attended church less often, had less conservative sexual attitudes and voting preferences, were more likely to smoke cigarettes and drank alcohol more often than people who explicitly refused. On standard personality scales, responders were more novelty-seeking and reward-dependent and less harm-avoidant than refusers. Structured psychiatric telephone interview data from 3674 individuals showed that, compared to refusers, responders had higher lifetime prevalence of major depression, alcohol dependence and childhood conduct disorder and also reported an earlier age at first sexual intercourse and higher rates of sexual abuse. In general, those who had initially agreed to receive the sex questionnaire but were subsequently lost were more similar to consenters than to refusers.
CONCLUSIONS: Effect sizes on most measures were small. The broad profile suggests that postal surveys of sexual attitudes and behaviour may overestimate sexual liberalism, activity and adversity, although this bias should not seriously compromise population estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9279618     DOI: 10.1093/ije/26.4.844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  29 in total

Review 1.  Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A M Johnson; S McManus; B Erens
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey.

Authors:  K Korkeila; S Suominen; J Ahvenainen; A Ojanlatva; P Rautava; H Helenius; M Koskenvuo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents.

Authors:  Andrea F de Winter; Albertine J Oldehinkel; René Veenstra; J Agnes Brunnekreef; Frank C Verhulst; Johan Ormel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Correlates of Individual Versus Joint Participation in Online Survey Research with Same-Sex Male Couples.

Authors:  Tyrel J Starks; Brett M Millar; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-06

5.  Sexuality in adolescent boys with autism spectrum disorder: self-reported behaviours and attitudes.

Authors:  Jeroen Dewinter; Robert Vermeiren; Ine Vanwesenbeeck; Jill Lobbestael; Chijs Van Nieuwenhuizen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-03

6.  Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?

Authors:  Kristin L Moilanen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-02-24

7.  Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms.

Authors:  D M Purdie; M P Dunne; F M Boyle; M D Cook; J M Najman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Sexual Function, Sexual Activity and Quality of Life in Women with Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  P Harter; I Schrof; L M Karl; R Hils; V Kullmann; A Traut; H Scheller; A du Bois
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in attitudes toward homosexuality: an Australian twin study.

Authors:  Karin J H Verweij; Sri N Shekar; Brendan P Zietsch; Lindon J Eaves; J Michael Bailey; Dorret I Boomsma; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  The socio-demographic patterning of sexual risk behaviour: a survey of young men in Finland and Estonia.

Authors:  Minna Nikula; Mika Gissler; Vesa Jormanainen; Made Laanpere; Heikki Kunnas; Elina Haavio-Mannila; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.