PURPOSE: To examine the impact of relative weight on mortality in black and white men and women. METHODS: Two representative national populations samples were used: the NHANES-I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS), and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The principal analysis focused on 13,242 participants in the NHEFS and 114,954 in the NHIS. Minimum mortality was estimated from both categorical analysis and a logistic model. RESULTS: Minimum mortality ranged from a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 32 kg/m2. The model-estimated BMI of minimum mortality for NHEFS was 27.1 (24.8-29.4, 95% CI), 26.8 (24.7-28.9, 95% CI), 24.8 (23.8-25.9, 95% CI) and 24.3 (23.2-25.4, 95% CI); for black men, black women, white men and white women, respectively, whereas for NHIS the corresponding values were 30.2 (24.8-35.6, 95% CI) 26.4 (24.2-28.7, 95% CI), 27.1 (25.5-28.7, 95% CI), and 25.6 (24.2-27.0, 95% CI). In all groups the shape of the relative risk curve was virtually identical and a broad range of BMI values in the middle of the distribution was associated with low relative mortality risk. Averaging the results from both surveys, the observed BMI of minimum risk was 3.1 kg/m2 higher in black men and 1.5 kg/m2 higher in black women than in their white counterparts; when adjusted for covariates these differences were only of borderline statistical significance, however. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the wide range of BMI values associated with low risk, and the consistency of the point of the up-turn in risk, group specific definitions of optimal values do not appear to be warranted.
PURPOSE: To examine the impact of relative weight on mortality in black and white men and women. METHODS: Two representative national populations samples were used: the NHANES-I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS), and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The principal analysis focused on 13,242 participants in the NHEFS and 114,954 in the NHIS. Minimum mortality was estimated from both categorical analysis and a logistic model. RESULTS: Minimum mortality ranged from a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 32 kg/m2. The model-estimated BMI of minimum mortality for NHEFS was 27.1 (24.8-29.4, 95% CI), 26.8 (24.7-28.9, 95% CI), 24.8 (23.8-25.9, 95% CI) and 24.3 (23.2-25.4, 95% CI); for black men, black women, white men and white women, respectively, whereas for NHIS the corresponding values were 30.2 (24.8-35.6, 95% CI) 26.4 (24.2-28.7, 95% CI), 27.1 (25.5-28.7, 95% CI), and 25.6 (24.2-27.0, 95% CI). In all groups the shape of the relative risk curve was virtually identical and a broad range of BMI values in the middle of the distribution was associated with low relative mortality risk. Averaging the results from both surveys, the observed BMI of minimum risk was 3.1 kg/m2 higher in black men and 1.5 kg/m2 higher in black women than in their white counterparts; when adjusted for covariates these differences were only of borderline statistical significance, however. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the wide range of BMI values associated with low risk, and the consistency of the point of the up-turn in risk, group specific definitions of optimal values do not appear to be warranted.
Authors: Chantal Matkin Dolan; Helena Kraemer; Warren Browner; Kristine Ensrud; Jennifer L Kelsey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-03-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kelly A Hirko; Elizabeth D Kantor; Sarah S Cohen; William J Blot; Meir J Stampfer; Lisa B Signorello Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sarah S Cohen; Lisa B Signorello; Elizabeth L Cope; Joseph K McLaughlin; Margaret K Hargreaves; Wei Zheng; William J Blot Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; George A Bray; Frank L Greenway; William D Johnson; Robert L Newton; Eric Ravussin; Donna H Ryan; Claude Bouchard Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Arun Krishnamoorthy; Melissa A Greiner; Alain G Bertoni; Zubin J Eapen; Emily C O'Brien; Lesley H Curtis; Adrian F Hernandez; Robert J Mentz Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Pramil N Singh; Ralph W Clark; Patti Herring; Joan Sabaté; David Shavlik; Gary E Fraser Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Holly Kramer; Katherine R Tuttle; David Leehey; Amy Luke; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; David Shoham; Richard Cooper; Srinvisan Beddhu Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Christina C Wee; Kenneth J Mukamal; Annong Huang; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 5.002