Literature DB >> 9279390

Intracellular monosaccharide and amino acid concentrations and activities and the mechanisms of insulin action.

S B Horowitz1, T W Pearson.   

Abstract

Current amino acid and monosaccharide transport models are based on an assumption which equates the intracellular chemical activity of a solute with its concentration. This assumption was tested for alpha-aminoisobutyric acid and 3-O-methylglucose in a giant cell, the amphibian oocyte, by using recently developed cryomicrodissection and internal reference phase techniques. We found the following. (i) alpha-Aminoisobutyric acid and 3-O-methylglucose activities were much greater in cytoplasm than was suggested by concentration data; i.e., activity coefficients were higher than in ordinary water solutions. This is attributable to the inaccessibility of considerable water as solvent (solute exclusion). (ii) Solute concentrations varied regionally as follows: nucleus > > animal cytoplasm > vegetal cytoplasm. Insulin increased the nucleus/cytoplasm concentration asymmetry, apparently by increasing cytoplasmic solute exclusion. (iii) Nuclear activity coefficients more closely resembled those of ordinary saline solutions so that nucleus/ extracellular concentration ratios reflected transmembrane activity gradients better than did cytoplasm (or whole cell)/extracellular ratios. (iv) Mediated passive alpha-aminoisobutyric acid and 3-O-methylglucose transport were constituent oocyte membrane properties. Membrane active transport was initiated with time (in the presence of substrate) and by insulin. (v) Increased temperature mimicked insulin in enhancing transmembrane alpha-aminoisobutyric acid activity gradients and increasing the nucleus/cytoplasm concentration asymmetry. These results indicated that concentration data are a misleading measure of cellular amino acid and monosaccharide activity; some consequences of this observation were explored. A model is proposed in which cell water has reduced solvent capacity or is compartmentalized (considered less likely) and is susceptible to physiological modulation. The model accounts for many observations in small cells, suggesting generality of the exclusion phenomenon and a previously unrecognized metabolic control mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 9279390      PMCID: PMC369361          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.1.9.769-784.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  48 in total

1.  Cytoplasmic exclusion as a basis for asymmetric nucleocytoplasmic solute distributions.

Authors:  S B Horowitz; P L Paine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Nuclear envelope permeability.

Authors:  P L Paine; L C Moore; S B Horowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Differential expression of Rous Sarcoma virus-specific transformation parameters in enucleated cells.

Authors:  H Beug; M Claviez; B M Jockusch; T Graf
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Reference phase analysis of free and bound intracellular solutes. I. Sodium and potassium in amphibian oocytes.

Authors:  S B Horowitz; P L Paine; L Tluczek; J K Reynhout
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Microtubules: structure, chemistry, and function.

Authors:  R E Stephens; K T Edds
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Potassium exchange in the whole cell, cytoplasm, and nucleus of amphibian oocytes.

Authors:  M Frank; S B Horowitz
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-03

7.  Some characteristics of amino acid transport in frog ovarian oocytes.

Authors:  R W Merriam
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  The permeability of the amphibian oocyte nucleus, in situ.

Authors:  S B Horowitz
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Electrolyte and non-electrolyte distribution in the Ehrlich ascites tumor cells during the cell cycle.

Authors:  A M DuPre; H G Hempling
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 6.384

10.  Action of insulin on sugar permeability in rat diaphragm muscle.

Authors:  D NORMAN; P MENOZZI; D REID; G LESTER; O HECHTER
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1959-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of water in some biological processes.

Authors:  P M Wiggins
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-12

2.  Subcellular in vivo 1H MR spectroscopy of Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  Seung-Cheol Lee; Jee-Hyun Cho; Daniel Mietchen; Young-Sook Kim; Kwan Soo Hong; Chulhyun Lee; Dongmin Kang; Ki Deok Park; Byong-Seok Choi; Chaejoon Cheong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Artifacts caused by cell microinjection.

Authors:  D S Miller; Y T Lau; S B Horowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  129Xe NMR-Protein Sensor Reveals Cellular Ribose Concentration.

Authors:  Serge D Zemerov; Benjamin W Roose; Kelsey L Farenhem; Zhuangyu Zhao; Madison A Stringer; Aaron R Goldman; David W Speicher; Ivan J Dmochowski
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Diffusive and nondiffusive proteins in vivo.

Authors:  P L Paine
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Numerical study of cell cryo-preservation: a network model of intracellular ice formation.

Authors:  Wei Li; Geer Yang; Aili Zhang; Lisa X Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Solvent properties of ground substance studied by cryomicrodissection and intracellular reference-phase techniques.

Authors:  S B Horowitz; D S Miller
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.