Literature DB >> 9278916

Quantitative anatomy of the cervical facet and the posterior projection of its inferior facet.

N A Ebraheim1, R Xu, E Challgren, R A Yeasting.   

Abstract

For this study, 41 cervical spines from C3 to C7 were directly evaluated. Anatomic evaluation of the cervical superior and inferior facets included the facet height, width, and angulation relative to the coronal plane. The projection of the inferior facet on the posterior aspect of the lateral mass was constructed and measured, and the dimensions of the lateral mass were evaluated. In general, the male linear parameters were larger than the female parameters, but the male angular dimensions were smaller than those of females. The posterior projection height of the inferior facet was found to be 7.4-9.0 mm from C3 to C7 for both sexes and was approximately 2 mm larger than half the height of the lateral mass. C6 and C7 had relative larger superior and inferior facet angles. The lateral mass was thinner at the level of C6-7. This study indicated that there may be a risk of violating the inferior articular facet and the related superior articular facet of the most caudal facet joint if a screw starting at the midpoint or below the midpoint of the lateral mass is directed perpendicular to the posterior aspect of the lateral mass at the level of C3-7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9278916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  6 in total

1.  Morphologic evaluation of the thoracic vertebrae for safe free-hand pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a CT-based anatomical study.

Authors:  Guanyu Cui; Kota Watanabe; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba; Lawrence G Lenke; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: biological and biomechanical factors.

Authors:  Howard S An; Koichi Masuda; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Cervical lateral mass screw fixation without fluoroscopic control: analysis of risk factors for complications associated with screw insertion.

Authors:  Shinichi Inoue; Tokuhide Moriyama; Toshiya Tachibana; Fumiaki Okada; Keishi Maruo; Yutaka Horinouchi; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  A novel radiographic targeting guide for percutaneous placement of transfacet screws in the cervical spine with limited fluoroscopy: A cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  David M Jackson; Jacqueline E Karp; Joseph R O'Brien; D Greg Anderson; Daniel E Gelb; Steven C Ludwig
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

5.  Morphometric analysis of the cervical facets and the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of Goel inter-facet spacer distraction technique.

Authors:  Abhidha Shah
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2014-01

6.  Use of 3D Navigation in Subaxial Cervical Spine Lateral Mass Screw Insertion.

Authors:  Abdullah Arab; Fahad Alkherayf; Adam Sachs; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2018-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.