Literature DB >> 9278742

Stress radiography and stress examination of the talocrural and subtalar joint on helical computed tomography.

F J van Hellemondt1, J W Louwerens, E S Sijbrandij, A P van Gils.   

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to compare subtalar inversion stress views using the Brodén view with inversion stress views on helical computed tomography (CT). One of the drawbacks of routine radiography is the imaging of three-dimensional structures in a two-dimensional plane. We investigated whether the use of helical CT would lead to a more objective and clearer measurable method to determine the amount of tilt in the subtalar joint. A group of 15 patients with unilateral chronic instability complaints and clinically suspected subtalar instability was examined. The contralateral asymptomatic foot was used as control. A variable amount of subtalar tilt (range, 4 degrees to 18 degrees) was demonstrated in all cases on stress radiographs, without finding significant difference between the symptomatic and asymptomatic feet. However, contrary to the findings at the talocrural level, subtalar tilt was found in none of the patients using helical CT. Thus, we now doubt that the tilt seen during stress examination using the Brodén view is the true amount of tilt. It may be that the lateral opening, seen on these radiographs, largely results from imaging two planes that have made a translatory and rotary movement relative to each other in an oblique direction. It is concluded that the Brodén stress examination might not be useful for screening patients with subtalar instability. Associated anomalies not visible on the radiographs were detected by helical CT. In four cases, narrowing of the articular cartilage and irregular and hypertrophic bone formation at the middle facet joint of the subtalar joints were found. It is likely that these changes cause disturbance of function of this joint and it is suggested that the subjective complaint of instability with "giving way" is not only caused by hypermobility, but can be caused by other disturbance of normal motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9278742     DOI: 10.1177/107110079701800805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of Ankle-Subtalar-Joint-Complex Laxity Using an Instrumented Ankle Arthrometer: An Experimental Cadaveric Investigation.

Authors:  John E Kovaleski; J Hollis; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; Albert W Pearsall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Application of generalizability theory in estimating the reliability of ankle-complex laxity measurement.

Authors:  Robert J Heitman; John E Kovaleski; Steven F Pugh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Mechanical contributions to chronic lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Tricia J Hubbard; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Currently used imaging options cannot accurately predict subtalar joint instability.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Maxwell W Weinberg; Nathan P Davidson; Megan K Mills; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Mechanical joint laxity associated with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Joellen M Sefton; Tricia J Hubbard
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.843

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.