Literature DB >> 9278659

Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation.

R Gilliland1, S Heymen, D F Altomare, U C Park, D Vickers, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to determine outcome and to identify predictors of success for biofeedback for constipation.
METHODS: Patients who had at least one biofeedback session were evaluated whether or not they completed a treatment course. Parameters assessed included use of cathartics, number of spontaneous bowel movements per week, presence of rectal pain, number of biofeedback sessions and results of anorectal physiology.
RESULTS: A total of 194 patients (59 male, 135 female) of median age 71 (range 11-96) years, including 30 with concomitant rectal pain, were treated. The median number of spontaneous bowel movements per week before treatment was 0. Some 35 per cent of patients had complete success (three or more spontaneous bowel movements per week with discontinuation of cathartics), 13 per cent had partial success (fewer than three spontaneous bowel movements per week with continued use of cathartics) and 51 per cent had no improvement. Neither patient age, sex nor duration of symptoms significantly affected outcome. Only 18 per cent of patients who had between two and four sessions had complete success, compared with 44 per cent of those who had five or more (P < 0.001). A total of 63 per cent of patients who completed the treatment protocol experienced complete success, compared with 25 per cent of those who self-discharged (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This large study indicates that the success rate of biofeedback for patients with constipation is less than previously reported. However, the success rate improves significantly after five or more sessions and is significantly related to the patient's willingness to complete treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9278659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  19 in total

Review 1.  Functional disorders of the anus and rectum.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; A Wald; N E Diamant; P Enck; J H Pemberton; S S Rao
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Idiopathic Constipation and Fecal Incontinence.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-12

Review 3.  Biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction in constipation.

Authors:  G Bassotti; F Chistolini; F Sietchiping-Nzepa; G de Roberto; A Morelli; G Chiarioni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-14

Review 4.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Recommendations on chronic constipation (including constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome) treatment.

Authors:  P Paré; Ronald Bridges; Malcolm C Champion; Subhas C Ganguli; James R Gray; E Jan Irvine; Victor Plourde; Pierre Poitras; Geoffrey K Turnbull; Paul Moayyedi; Nigel Flook; Stephen M Collins
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Paradoxical puborectalis contraction and increased perineal descent.

Authors:  Ron G Landmann; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

7.  Irritable bowel syndrome: a multidimensional disorder cannot be understood or treated from a unidimensional perspective.

Authors:  Ami D Sperber; Douglas A Drossman
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Treatment of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

9.  Functional anorectal disorders.

Authors:  Melissa L Times; Craig A Reickert
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

10.  Predictive capability of anorectal physiologic tests for unfavorable outcomes following biofeedback therapy in dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Jae Kook Shin; Jae Hee Cheon; Eun Sook Kim; Jin Young Yoon; Jin Ha Lee; Soung Min Jeon; Hyun Jung Bok; Jae Jun Park; Chang Mo Moon; Sung Pil Hong; Yong Chan Lee; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.