Literature DB >> 9276587

Evidence-based medicine, practice variations and clinical freedom.

J R Hampton1.   

Abstract

Much of cardiovascular disease can be treated on the basis of the results of large clinical trials and can be considered 'evidence-based'. However, trial results are not infallible and it is important to recognize their limitations. Despite the evidence, widespread variation exists in medical practice between and within countries; the reasons may be cultural, or may indicate poor medical education. Purchasing authorities have to do the best they can with available evidence, and our full evidence base needs to include costs; in some instances we now have evidence of benefit from treatment that we almost certainly cannot afford. Evidence-based medicine is a further - but possibly an acceptable - limitation to clinical freedom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276587     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1997.00094.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms.

Authors:  S E Straus; F A McAlister
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Clinical research in hand surgery.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Fundamental deficiencies in the megatrial methodology.

Authors:  Bruce G Charlton
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001

4.  Evidence-based medicine: the fourth revolution in American medicine?

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Ashwin N Ram
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.730

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.