Literature DB >> 9276546

Comparative sensitivity of 13 species of pathogenic bacteria to seven chemical germicides.

J L Sagripanti1, C A Eklund, P A Trost, K C Jinneman, C Abeyta, C A Kaysner, W E Hill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative resistance of diverse human bacterial pathogens to commonly used germicidal agents has not been established.
METHODS: We measured by titration the survival of thirteen different bacteria after exposure to glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, cupric ascorbate, sodium hypochlorite, or phenol.
RESULTS: Our comparative experiments allowed classification of the organisms' survival into four groups: (a) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus showed the most resistance, (b) Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 showed intermediate resistance, (c) Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella sonnei, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus survived some treatments with chemical agents only in the presence of protecting protein (serum albumin), and (d) Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio vulnificus, Bacillus cereus, and Yersinia enterocolitica did not survive any of the treatments applied.
CONCLUSION: We found species that more frequently survived exposure to germicidal agents were also those most commonly reported in association with hospital infections. Our findings suggest that resistance to disinfectants may be more important than pathogenicity in determining the relative prominence of an organism as an agent responsible for nosocomial infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276546     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90026-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  8 in total

Review 1.  Potential impact of increased use of biocides in consumer products on prevalence of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Peter Gilbert; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

3.  Microbial inactivation for safe and rapid diagnostics of infectious samples.

Authors:  Jose-Luis Sagripanti; Birgit Hülseweh; Gudrun Grote; Luzie Voss; Katrin Böhling; Hans-Jürgen Marschall
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Further characterization of Vibrio vulnificus rugose variants and identification of a capsular and rugose exopolysaccharide gene cluster.

Authors:  Brenda L Grau; Margaret C Henk; Katherine L Garrison; Brett J Olivier; Randall M Schulz; Kathy L O'Reilly; Gregg S Pettis
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Reprocessing and reuse of urological armamentarium: How correct are we!

Authors:  Krutik Vipulbhai Raval; Rajeev Chaudhari; Shahil Rameshbhai Khant; Omkar Joglekar; Dipen Patel
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Back to Basics: Choosing the Appropriate Surface Disinfectant.

Authors:  Angelica Artasensi; Sarah Mazzotta; Laura Fumagalli
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

7.  Pathogen Inactivating Properties and Increased Sensitivity in Molecular Diagnostics by PAXgene, a Novel Non-Crosslinking Tissue Fixative.

Authors:  Martina Loibner; Walter Buzina; Christian Viertler; Daniel Groelz; Anja Hausleitner; Gintare Siaulyte; Iris Kufferath; Bettina Kölli; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Biosafety during a pandemic: shared resource laboratories rise to the challenge.

Authors:  Avrill M Aspland; Iyadh Douagi; Andrew Filby; Evan R Jellison; Lola Martinez; Diana Shinko; Adrian L Smith; Vera A Tang; Sherry Thornton
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.714

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.