Literature DB >> 9276098

Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.

R C Beattie1, T Barr, C Roup.   

Abstract

The effects of noise on word recognition scores were assessed with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Fifty-one normal-hearing subjects were tested at 50 dB HL using signal-to-noise ratios (S/Ns) of 5, 10, and 15 dB. Thirty subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing losses were tested in quiet and in noise at S/Ns of 10 dB and 15 dB. Monosyllabic words in a Multitalker Noise were selected for testing. Mean scores for the normal-hearing subjects were 45% at the 5 dB S/N, 74% at the 10 dB S/N, and 87% at the 15 dB S/N. For the hearing-impaired subjects, scores were 85% in quiet, 60% at the 15 dB S/N, and 40% at the 10 dB S/N. These results suggest that background noise which is mildly disruptive for normal hearing subjects can be highly disruptive to hearing-impaired subjects. Moreover, these findings indicate that subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss require a more favourable S/N than normal listeners to achieve comparable word recognition scores. Test-retest differences for word recognition scores revealed variability that agreed closely with predictions based on the binomial distribution for both groups of subjects. Speech-in-noise abilities must be measured directly because regression equations revealed that speech-in-noise scores cannot be predicted accurately from either puretone thresholds or speech-in-quiet scores. Word recognition functions are presented from several hearing-impaired subjects and demonstrate the value of testing in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276098     DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  6 in total

1.  A latent consolidation phase in auditory identification learning: time in the awake state is sufficient.

Authors:  Daphne Ari-Even Roth; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Minka Hildesheimer; Avi Karni
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Platinum-induced ototoxicity in children: a consensus review on mechanisms, predisposition, and protection, including a new International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston ototoxicity scale.

Authors:  Penelope R Brock; Kristin R Knight; David R Freyer; Kathleen C M Campbell; Peter S Steyger; Brian W Blakley; Shahrad R Rassekh; Kay W Chang; Brian J Fligor; Kaukab Rajput; Michael Sullivan; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry.

Authors:  Rawish Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Munjal; Anuradha Sharma; Md Noorain Alam; Naresh K Panda
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Writing superiority in cued recall.

Authors:  Carina Fueller; Jens Loescher; Peter Indefrey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 5.  Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.

Authors:  Alexandra MacPherson; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Perception of Tamil Mono-Syllabic and Bi-Syllabic Words in Multi-Talker Speech Babble by Young Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sasirekha Gnanasekar; Ramya Vaidyanath
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-06-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.