Literature DB >> 9276047

The arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability: two-year results of a multiple suture technique.

L F McIntyre1, R B Caspari, F H Savoie.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to review the results of an arthroscopic posterior capsular shift procedure. Twenty consecutive shoulders in 19 patients were treated with an arthroscopic posterior capsular shift for symptomatic posterior shoulder instability. Patients underwent the procedure if they exhibited a posterior Bankart lesion or had complaints of posterior instability and evidence of increased posterior joint laxity on physical examination and examination under anesthesia. Twelve of the 20 patients were injured during athletic activity. All surgeries were performed in an outpatient setting. Twelve of the 20 patients had posterior Bankart lesions and 10 had anterior Hill-Sachs lesions. The procedure entails releasing the posterior labroligamentous structures from the posterior glenoid and freshening the glenoid neck with a bur. A suture punch is used to place multiple absorbable monofilament stitches in the ligament complex. The stitches are brought through a supraclavicular portal and tied over the clavicle or scapular spine. All 20 shoulders were evaluated at an average of 31 months postoperatively with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Based on the outcome scale described by Tibone and Bradley, the average postoperative score was 83 out of a possible 100, with 15 excellent, 2 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor results. There were two recurrent dislocations and three subluxations for an overall recurrence rate of 25%. All the recurrences occurred in patients with posterior Bankart lesions and four of the five had a voluntary component to their instability. There were no neurovascular complications or infections. Arthroscopic evaluation facilitated the diagnosis of posterior instability with the visualization of intra-articular pathology that is difficult to identify during open procedures. Although the majority of patients were able to return to vigorous activities, a recurrence rate of 25% is disturbing and consistent with recurrence rates for open procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9276047     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90119-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  19 in total

1.  Arthroscopic stabilization of posterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Y Engelsma; W J Willems
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The split portal: Description of a new accessory posterior portal for arthroscopic shoulder instability procedures.

Authors:  Guillaume Mirouse; Geoffroy Nourissat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Open and arthroscopic procedures for posterior shoulder instability].

Authors:  S Lichtenberg; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Arthroscopic posterior bone block: surgical technique.

Authors:  Laurent Lafosse; Giorgio Franceschi; Bartlomiej Kordasiewicz; Wade J Andrews; Daniel Schwartz
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-08-22

5.  Posterior bone block procedure for posterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Elvire Servien; Gilles Walch; Zenia E Cortes; T Bradley Edwards; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Evaluation of arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  José Carlos Garcia; Lucas Russo Maia; Juliano Rocha Fonseca; José Luís Amim Zabeu; Jesely Pereira Myrrha Garcia
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 7.  Bone loss in patients with posterior gleno-humeral instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Giacomo Rizzello; Joel Locher; Giuseppe Salvatore; Pino Florio; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Surgical outcomes in the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification system for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Justin A Magnuson; Brian R Wolf; Kevin J Cronin; Cale A Jacobs; Shannon F Ortiz; John E Kuhn; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  The Rotator Interval of the Shoulder: Implications in the Treatment of Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Dean Taylor; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Timothy S Mologne; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-29

Review 10.  Posterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Ivan J Antosh; John M Tokish; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.