Literature DB >> 9274759

Contrast masking effects change with practice.

A Dorais1, D Sagi.   

Abstract

Contrast detection thresholds are known to increase with background contrast, a phenomenon called contrast masking. We found that, under some conditions, observers improved their masked detection performance by repetitive practice of a masking experiment. This learning effect resulted in a cancellation of suprathreshold contrast masking within the contrast range measured. A two-alternative forced-choice discrimination paradigm was used, with stimuli consisting of Gabor signals as maskers and target, presented at the same location and time. Untrained observers showed increased detection thresholds with increasing mask contrast for suprathreshold mask contrasts, but perceptual learning caused an elimination of this classical effect, with masked thresholds reaching the no-mask level and below. Learning did not decrease, but rather somewhat increased, discrimination thresholds when target and mask shared the same Gabor signal parameters. Performance improvement was found to be specific for orientation and mask configurations, though it did transfer between mirror symmetric mask configurations and between eyes. These results argue against a static transducer function-based account for contrast masking and are consistent with a theory assuming multiple feature-based interactive network capable of long-term gain modifications.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274759     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00329-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  MECHANISMS OF PERCEPTUAL LEARNING.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Learn Percept       Date:  2009-06-01

2.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Perceptual learning in contrast detection: presence and cost of shifts in response criteria.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Christoph Rasche
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

4.  Exogenous and endogenous attention during perceptual learning differentially affect post-training target thresholds.

Authors:  Ikuko Mukai; Kandy Bahadur; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologies.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Hebbian Reweighting on Stable Representations in Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Learn Percept       Date:  2009-06-01

7.  Is improved contrast sensitivity a natural consequence of visual training?

Authors:  Aaron Levi; Danielle Shaked; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Stimulus roving and flankers affect perceptual learning of contrast discrimination in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Mehdi Sanayei; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Daniel H Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The role of alpha-rhythm states in perceptual learning: insights from experiments and computational models.

Authors:  Rodrigo Sigala; Sebastian Haufe; Dipanjan Roy; Hubert R Dinse; Petra Ritter
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.