Literature DB >> 9274212

Quality of life: perceptions of residential care.

H Byrne1, D MacLean.   

Abstract

Residents in selected aged care facilities in Australia (n = 185) and New Zealand (n = 44) completed a 56 item quality of life instrument derived and refined through grounded theory. Ten scales were developed from the items. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that there were no main differences as a function of cohort (Alzheimer's or non-Alzheimer's) or country of residence (Australia or New Zealand). Significant differences emerged as a function of the source of help in completing the instrument. Where nursing staff assisted residents complete the instrument, scoring indicated that residents enjoyed a better quality of life than if the instrument was completed by the resident alone, or with assistance from non-nursing staff and others, including relatives, welfare students and diversional therapists. Nursing staff rather than non-professional nursing staff tended to work more with non-Alzheimer residents when completing the questionnaire. Significant differences were also discovered in the ranking of concerns on the basis of cohort and country of residence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1322-7114            Impact factor:   2.066


  2 in total

1.  How are quality of life ratings made? Toward a model of quality of life in people with dementia.

Authors:  L M T Byrne-Davis; P D Bennett; G K Wilcock
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A review of quality of life in Alzheimer's disease. Part 1: Issues in assessing disease impact.

Authors:  M D Walker; S S Salek; A J Bayer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.