Literature DB >> 9274074

One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

W Becker1, B E Becker, H Israelson, J P Lucchini, M Handelsman, W Ammons, E Rosenberg, L Rose, L M Tucker, U Lekholm.   

Abstract

This prospective longitudinal multicenter study evaluated the clinical outcomes after placement and restoration of one-step Brånemark implants into the maxillae and mandibles of completely and partially edentulous patients. Six surgical treatment centers participated in this study, in which 135 implants were placed into 63 adult patients. All implants were stable after placement. The majority of implants were placed into type B bone with minimal jaw resorption and type 2 bone quality. After implant placement, standard transmucosal healing abutments were firmly placed. The average amount of time between implant placement and prosthetic abutment connection was 170 days in the maxillae and 147 days in the mandibles. To evaluate crestal bone changes caused by implant placement, a periodontal probe was used to measure midbuccally from the top of the implant cylinder to the alveolar crest; in 29 patients, 54 midbuccal bone crest sites were remeasured following prosthetic abutment connection. Crestal bone changes in mandibles and maxillae were statistically and clinically insignificant. Six implants were lost prior to loading and one implant has not been restored. No implants or restorations were lost after loading. At 1 year, the implant success rate was 95.6%. Mesiodistal radiographic measurements from 34 patients were averaged, and changes from prosthetic abutment connection to, on average, 12 months follow-up were compared. The radiographs, which were digitalized, measured from the bottom of the implant cylinder to the most coronal bone in contact with implant thread. For mandibular implants, the mean radiographic bone level at prosthetic abutment connection was 1.07 mm; after loading, it was 1.35 mm. For maxillary implants, the mean radiographic bone height at prosthetic abutment connection was 1.16 mm; after loading, it was 1.36 mm. These changes were not statistically significant. The 1-year outcomes from this patient series indicate that one-step Brånemark implants provide excellent clinical results when placed in patients with good bone quality and quantity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants in Maxilla and Mandible: One Year Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Muhamed Ajanović; Adis Hamzić; Sead Redžepagić; Alma Kamber-Ćesir; Lejla Kazazić; Selma Tosum
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-06

2.  Radiographic Vertical Bone Loss Evaluation around Dental Implants Following One Year of Functional Loading.

Authors:  Aar Rasouli Ghahroudi; Ar Talaeepour; A Mesgarzadeh; Ar Rokn; A Khorsand; Nn Mesgarzadeh; Mj Kharazi Fard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-06-30

3.  A New Method of Measuring the Volumetric Change of Alveolar Bone Around Dental Implants Using Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Young-Wook Lim; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Comparative Study Between an Immediate Loading Protocol Using the Digital Workflow and a Conventional Protocol for Dental Implant Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Piyanut Rattanapanich; Weerapan Aunmeungtong; Pisaisit Chaijareenont; Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Comparison of Bone Healing in Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement.

Authors:  Gagandeep Singh; Rajat Pareek; Gaurav Singh Rajawat; Aljeeta Kadam; Mahmoud Al Abdulsalam; Abdulrahman Al Abdulathim
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

6.  Zygomatic approach with single-piece implants: A technical note.

Authors:  Vivek Gaur; Anita Gala Doshi; Lukasz Palka
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

7.  The effect of loading time on marginal bone change of implants immediately placed after extraction: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Lee; Euy-Hyun Kim; Dong-Keon Lee; In-Seok Song; Sang-Ho Jun
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-04

8.  Findings of a Four-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two-Piece and One-Piece Zirconia Abutments Supporting Single Prosthetic Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Region.

Authors:  Guerino Paolantoni; Gaetano Marenzi; Andrea Blasi; Jolanda Mignogna; Gilberto Sammartino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Recent advances in dental implants.

Authors:  Do Gia Khang Hong; Ji-Hyeon Oh
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-11-05

10.  Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Immediate Loading in Single-Implant Restoration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paolo Capparé; Francesco Ferrini; Corrado Ruscica; Giuseppe Pantaleo; Giulia Tetè; Enrico Felice Gherlone
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.