Literature DB >> 9273919

A prospective study of the utility of standardized instruments in predicting recidivism among first DWI offenders.

S C Lapham1, B J Skipper, G L Simpson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the utility of four instruments--the MacAndrews scale of the MMPI-2 (MAC), four scales of the Alcohol Use Inventory (AUI), the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) and the Skinner's Trauma Scale (STS)--in assessing risk for rearrest among first driving while impaired (DWI) offenders.
METHOD: Subjects were clients (N = 1,384, 80% male) convicted of a DWI offense who were referred to the Lovelace Comprehensive Screening Program for evaluation and who completed a court-mandated screening program. Stratified life table analysis was used to determine rearrest rates in the period following the screening referral.
RESULTS: After 4 years of follow-up the overall rearrest rate was 21.0%. The best predictors of recidivism were a MAC score of 23 or above, elevated scores on AUI scales, young male status (age 30 or under) and arrest blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .200% or above. The best schematic for classifying first offenders into risk groups was determined using the risk factors above and defined groups with recidivism rates ranging from 13.0% to 38.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to identify cohorts of first offenders at relatively low and high risk for recidivism using a stratified analysis with six strata defined from four variables. The MAC was the best, single variable for classifying offenders' future recidivism risk, indicating that, in addition to evaluating for the presence and severity of alcohol and drug use, screening programs for DWI offenders should carefully evaluate personality factors in making referral and sentencing recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9273919     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  8 in total

1.  Life-time drinking course of driving-while-impaired offenders.

Authors:  Sandra C Lapham; Betty J Skipper; Marcia Russell
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Convicted driving-while-impaired offenders' views on effectiveness of sanctions and treatment.

Authors:  Sandra Lapham; Elizabeth England-Kennedy
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-04-13

3.  Cognitive and behavioral preoccupation with alcohol in recidivist DUI offenders.

Authors:  Melissa A Miller; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Persistence of addictive disorders in a first-offender driving while impaired population.

Authors:  Sandra C Lapham; Robert Stout; Georgia Laxton; Betty J Skipper
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-04

5.  Do deterrence and social-control theories predict driving after drinking 15 years after a DWI conviction?

Authors:  Sandra C Lapham; Michael Todd
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2012-01-07

6.  Does screening classification predict long-term outcomes of DWI offenders?

Authors:  Sandra C Lapham; Betty J Skipper
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

7.  Alcohol criteria endorsement and psychiatric and drug use disorders among DUI offenders: greater severity among women and multiple offenders.

Authors:  Vivia V McCutcheon; Andrew C Heath; Howard J Edenberg; Richard A Grucza; Victor M Hesselbrock; John R Kramer; Laura Jean Bierut; Kathleen K Bucholz
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Drinking and driving relapse: Data from BAC and MMPI-2.

Authors:  Paolo Roma; Cristina Mazza; Giorgia Ferracuti; Maria Elena Cinti; Stefano Ferracuti; Franco Burla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.