Literature DB >> 9272944

Mouse-chick chimera: a developmental model of murine neurogenic cells.

J Fontaine-Pérus1, P Halgand, Y Chéraud, T Rouaud, M E Velasco, C Cifuentes Diaz, F Rieger.   

Abstract

Chimeras were prepared by transplanting fragments of neural primordium from 8- to 8.5- and 9-day postcoital mouse embryos into 1.5- and 2-day-old chick embryos at different axial levels. Mouse neuroepithelial cells differentiated in ovo and organized to form the different cellular compartments normally constituting the central nervous system. The graft also entered into the development of the peripheral nervous system through migration of neural crest cells associated with mouse neuroepithelium. Depending on the graft level, mouse crest cells participated in the formation of various derivatives such as head components, sensory ganglia, orthosympathetic ganglionic chain, nerves and neuroendocrine glands. Tenascin knockout mice, which express lacZ instead of tenascin and show no tenascin production (Saga, Y., Yagi, J., Ikawa, Y., Sakakura, T. and Aizawa, S. (1992) Genes and Development 6, 1821-1838), were specifically used to label Schwann cells lining nerves derived from the implant. Although our experiments do not consider how mouse neural tube can participate in the mechanism required to maintain myogenesis in the host somites, they show that the grafted neural tube behaves in the same manner as the chick host neural tube. Together with our previous results on somite development (Fontaine-Pérus, J., Jarno, V., Fournier Le Ray, C., Li, Z. and Paulin, D. (1995) Development 121, 1705-1718), this study shows that chick embryo constitutes a privileged environment, facilitating access to the developmental potentials of normal or defective mammalian cells. It allows the study of the histogenesis and precise timing of a known structure, as well as the implication of a given gene at all equivalent mammalian embryonic stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9272944     DOI: 10.1242/dev.124.16.3025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  7 in total

Review 1.  The cells that fill the bill: neural crest and the evolution of craniofacial development.

Authors:  A H Jheon; R A Schneider
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  An epiblast stem cell-derived multipotent progenitor population for axial extension.

Authors:  Shlomit Edri; Penny Hayward; Peter Baillie-Johnson; Benjamin J Steventon; Alfonso Martinez Arias
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  A late requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling during activin-induced formation of foregut endoderm from mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Mattias Hansson; Dorthe R Olesen; Janny M L Peterslund; Nina Engberg; Morten Kahn; Maria Winzi; Tino Klein; Poul Maddox-Hyttel; Palle Serup
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Development of teeth in chick embryos after mouse neural crest transplantations.

Authors:  Thimios A Mitsiadis; Yvonnick Chéraud; Paul Sharpe; Josiane Fontaine-Pérus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A simple PCR-based strategy for estimating species-specific contributions in chimeras and xenografts.

Authors:  Erin L Ealba; Richard A Schneider
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  Neural crest and the origin of species-specific pattern.

Authors:  Richard A Schneider
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 7.  Location, Location, Location: Signals in Muscle Specification.

Authors:  Chih-Ning Chang; Chrissa Kioussi
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.