Literature DB >> 9271971

A randomized trial of one-to-one nurse support of women in labor.

A J Gagnon1, K Waghorn, C Covell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health researchers and provider groups have recommended that women in labor should receive continuous professional support. The objective of our study was to compare the risks and benefits of one-to-one nurse labor support with usual intrapartum nursing care.
METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a 637-bed university hospital in Montreal, Quebec, with 413 nulliparous women who were at more than 37 weeks' gestation, carrying singletons, and in labor. Women with scheduled cesarean section, scheduled induction, breech presentation, presence of paid labor support, or cervical dilatation over 4 cm were excluded. One-to-one care consisted of the presence of a nurse during labor and birth who provided emotional support, physical comfort, and instruction for relaxation and coping techniques. Usual care consisted of care for two or three laboring women with various types of supportive activities.
RESULTS: A beneficial trend due to one-to-one nurse support was found with a 17 percent reduction in risk of oxytocin stimulation (relative risk of experimental vs control = 0.83; 95% confidence interval = 0.67, 1.04). No significant differences were found in overall labor durations and overall rates of total cesarean section, cesarean section for cephalopelvic disproportion, epidural analgesia, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, instrumental vaginal delivery, and perineal trauma.
CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial trend attributed to one-to-one nursing in reduction of oxytocin stimulation suggests that implementation of recommendations for continuous professional support by intrapartum nursing staff may be appropriate in North America.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9271971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  7 in total

1.  Doula Support and Attitudes of Intrapartum Nurses: A Qualitative Study from the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Karla Papagni; Ellen Buckner
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Continuous support for women during childbirth.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Simon Gates; G Justus Hofmeyr; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

3.  Continuous support for women during childbirth.

Authors:  Meghan A Bohren; G Justus Hofmeyr; Carol Sakala; Rieko K Fukuzawa; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-06

4.  Support to woman by a companion of her choice during childbirth: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Odalea M Bruggemann; Mary A Parpinelli; Maria J D Osis; Jose G Cecatti; Antonio S Carvalhinho Neto
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system.

Authors:  Nina Knape; Herbert Mayer; Wilfried Schnepp; Friederike zu Sayn-Wittgenstein
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The effect of perinatal education on Iranian mothers' stress and labor pain.

Authors:  Mozhgan Firouzbakht; Maryam Nikpour; Hajar Salmalian; Farideh Mohsenzadeh Ledari; Sorya Khafri
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2013-10-14

Review 7.  Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation.

Authors:  Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian; Anayda Portela
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.