Literature DB >> 9271715

Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer.

Y Y Tsai1, G M Petersen, S V Booker, J A Bacon, S R Hamilton, F M Giardiello.   

Abstract

Anecdotal reports of hereditary colorectal cancer suggest that genetic anticipation (earlier appearance in successive generations) occurs, but ascertainment bias and cohort effects confound this interpretation. Using approaches that correct for such biases, we examined the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer from family history questionnaires completed by subjects in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry; 475 parent-offspring pairs in 308 pedigrees were studied. We observed the expected cohort effect among offspring, in that the mean ages at diagnosis of those born before 1921, between 1921 and 1930, and after 1930 were 63 +/- 13 (SD), 57 +/- 10, and 42 +/- 10 years, respectively, while their parents' mean ages were 65 +/- 14, 66 +/- 14, and 58 +/- 15 years, respectively. In the cohort born before 1921, in which observation periods for both parents and offspring were comparable, there was no difference in age at diagnosis by pairwise comparison or life table analysis (P = 0.15 and 0.23, respectively; r = 0.32). Subgroup analysis of 67 pairs from 38 families that met the International Collaborative Group (ICG) criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and of 14 pairs from 7 families with known germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes also showed no significant differences (mean age at diagnosis: 56 +/- 14 years for parents and 57 +/- 16 years for offspring from ICG families, and 45 +/- 10 years for parents and 44 +/- 12 years for offspring in families with known mutations). We also found no evidence for effect of parental gender on age at diagnosis in offspring of either gender, nor a secular trend toward younger onset colorectal cancer in this sample. In conclusion, there is no evidence for genetic anticipation or genomic imprinting of age at diagnosis in this sample of colorectal cancer families. Apparent anticipation appears to reflect a birth cohort bias of ascertainment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9271715     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:4<435::AID-GEPI8>3.0.CO;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  13 in total

Review 1.  A review of statistical methods for testing genetic anticipation: looking for an answer in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Stephen B Gruber; Victoria M Raymond; Shu-Chen Huang; Susanne Timshel; Mef Nilbert; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Fertility and apparent genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Douglas Stupart; Aung Ko Win; Mark Jenkins; Ingrid M Winship; Paul Goldberg; Rajkumar Ramesar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The interval between cancer diagnosis among mothers and offspring in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Ora Paltiel; Yehiel Friedlander; Lisa Deutsch; Rebecca Yanetz; Ronit Calderon-Margalit; Efrat Tiram; Hagit Hochner; Micha Barchana; Susan Harlap; Orly Manor
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Dependence of colorectal cancer risk on the parent-of-origin of mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.

Authors:  Christine M van Vliet; James G Dowty; Jane L van Vliet; Letitia Smith; Leeanne J Mead; Finlay A Macrae; D James B St John; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey; Mark A Jenkins; Gary M Velan; John L Hopper
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 5.  Clinical description of the Lynch syndrome [hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)].

Authors:  H F A Vasen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Evidence for genetic anticipation in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander A Westphalen; Anna M Russell; Mauro Buser; Claudine Rey Berthod; Pierre Hutter; Martina Plasilova; Hansjakob Mueller; Karl Heinimann
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Bayesian modeling for genetic anticipation in presence of mutational heterogeneity: a case study in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Bhramar Mukherjee; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mef Nilbert; Victor Moreno; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Potential genetic anticipation in hereditary leiomyomatosis-renal cell cancer (HLRCC).

Authors:  Mei Hua Wong; Chuen Seng Tan; Soo Chin Lee; Yvonne Yong; Aik Seng Ooi; Joanne Ngeow; Min Han Tan
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Parent of origin effects on age at colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor; Kari G Rabe; Gloria M Petersen; Helen Chen; Bharati Bapat; John Hopper; Joanne Young; Mark Jenkins; John Potter; Polly Newcomb; Allyson Templeton; Loic Lemarchand; John Grove; Michael R Burgio; Robert Haile; Jane Green; Michael O Woods; Daniela Seminara; Paul J Limburg; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  No evidence of genetic anticipation in a large family with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  D Stupart; P Goldberg; U Algar; A Vorster; R Ramesar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.