Literature DB >> 9270149

Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: how good is the nominal group technique.

S Redman1, S Carrick, J Cockburn, S Hirst.   

Abstract

The National Health and Medical Research Council National Breast Cancer Centre was established to improve outcomes for women by reviewing the literature, developing best practice guidelines and resources and developing a national monitoring system. Its broad terms of reference meant that it was important at the outset to identify priorities for action. The Centre used a national consultative process based on nominal groups to identify priorities. Thirteen consultative workshops were held with over 300 participants including women diagnosed with breast cancer, some of their families and health professionals. There was a high level of agreement between workshops in priorities identified, indicating that the nominal group process results in reliable data. A sub-sample of participants surveyed after the workshops reported being highly satisfied with their participation in the process. The findings indicate that the nominal group process can be useful in selecting priorities for action in health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9270149     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01695.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  11 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  O F Norheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Disease modification in gout: a qualitative study of gout expert rheumatologists.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Goals of gout treatment: a patient perspective.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Facilitators and barriers to adherence to urate-lowering therapy in African-Americans with gout: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 5.  Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice.

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Justin Walsh; Jessica Stewart
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-11-18

6.  Gout and comorbidity: a nominal group study of people with gout.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Gout and sexual function: patient perspective of how gout affects personal relationships and intimacy.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2019-02-28

8.  Setting and meeting priorities in Indigenous health research in Australia and its application in the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal health.

Authors:  Johanna M Monk; Kevin G Rowley; Ian Ps Anderson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-11-20

9.  Combining evidence and values in priority setting: testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country.

Authors:  Emmanuel Makundi; Lydia Kapiriri; Ole Frithjof Norheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The impact of gout on patient's lives: a study of African-American and Caucasian men and women with gout.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.