Literature DB >> 9269883

The relationship between socioeconomic status, hostility, and blood pressure reactions to mental stress in men: data from the Whitehall II study.

D Carroll1, G Davey Smith, D Sheffield, M J Shipley, M G Marmot.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship among blood pressure reactions to mental stress, cynical hostility, and socioeconomic status (SES) in 1,091 male public servants. Occupational grade served to index SES and cynical hostility was assessed using the Cook-Medley scale. (Cook & Medley, 1954). The magnitude of systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure change scores to stress was positively associated with occupational grade: the higher the grade, the greater the reactions. Mental stress task performance also varied with occupational grade but was unrelated to reactivity. Ratings of task difficulty did not vary with occupational grade. Cynical hostility was negatively related to occupational grade, and, contrary to previous findings, negatively related to systolic blood pressure reactivity. Cynical hostility was also negatively related to mental stress task performance but unrelated to ratings of task difficulty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9269883     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  19 in total

1.  Psychological stress and cardiovascular disease. Rose questionnaire is not what it seems.

Authors:  Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

2.  Mediators of the relationship between socioeconomic status and allostatic load in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study (CHASRS).

Authors:  Louise C Hawkley; Leah A Lavelle; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Mediation and modification of the association between hopelessness, hostility, and progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Ricardo A Pollitt; Mark Daniel; Jay S Kaufman; John W Lynch; Jukka T Salonen; George A Kaplan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-02

4.  Should years of schooling be used to guide treatment of coronary risk factors?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Does personality explain social inequalities in mortality? The French GAZEL cohort study.

Authors:  Hermann Nabi; Mika Kivimäki; Michael G Marmot; Jane Ferrie; Marie Zins; Pierre Ducimetière; Silla M Consoli; Archana Singh-Manoux
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Childhood poverty and blood pressure reactivity to and recovery from an acute stressor in late adolescence: the mediating role of family conflict.

Authors:  Gary W Evans; Deinera Exner-Cortens; Pilyoung Kim; Daniel Bartholomew
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Incarceration History and Uncontrolled Blood Pressure in a Multi-Site Cohort.

Authors:  Benjamin A Howell; Jessica B Long; E Jennifer Edelman; Kathleen A McGinnis; David Rimland; David A Fiellin; Amy C Justice; Emily A Wang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Socioeconomic differences in psychosocial factors contributing to coronary heart disease: a review.

Authors:  Zuzana Skodova; Iveta Nagyova; Jitse P van Dijk; Adriana Sudzinova; Helena Vargova; Martin Studencan; S A Reijneveld
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2008-05-24

9.  The psychosocial vulnerability model of hostility as a predictor of coronary heart disease in low-income African Americans.

Authors:  Karen B Grothe; Jamie S Bodenlos; Dori Whitehead; Jake Olivier; Phillip J Brantley
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2008-05-14

10.  Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Responses to Standardized Stressors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Morozink Boylan; Jenny M Cundiff; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.