Literature DB >> 9269646

Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK 506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants.

G Filler1, R Grygas, I Mai, H J Stolpe, C Greiner, S Bauer, J H Ehrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only few data exist on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children. PATIENTS: In 1995 and 1996, 14 children (mean age 13 years, range 5-23 years) received tacrolimus after renal transplantation; 10 of these after biopsy-proven steroid-resistant rejection (2 with vascular rejection), two for cyclosporin A (CsA)-induced severe nephrotoxicity, one for untreatable gingival hyperplasia on CsA, and one child was treated primarily after transplantation because of severe liver involvement in nephronophthisis. Pharmacokinetic investigations were performed after establishing a stable maintenance dose with trough levels in the desired window of 5-12 ng/ml.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 6 months (range 3-25 months). Eleven patients are still on tacrolimus. Two were discontinued because of severe aggravation of chronic persistent hepatitis C (one of them also developed diabetes mellitus), and one patient was subsequently switched to conventional immunosuppression because of tacrolimus-associated nephrotoxicity. All tacrolimus levels were measured by a modified assay (MEIA, Tacrolimus, Abbott) with improved sensitivity. At the time of switch, median serum creatinine was 234 +/- 82 mumol/l and 6 months after switch 201 +/- 99 mumol/l. All grafts are still functioning. Mean FK-506 dose was 0.16 mg/kg body weight/day (range 0.036-0.30 mg/kg). Mean trough level was 7.1 +/- 2.6 ng/ml in the morning and 6.5 +/- 2.0 ng/ml in the evening. Median time of maximum concentration (tmax) was 120 min after application, and the mean maximum concentration (Cmax) was 15.2 +/- 6.7 ng/ml. Mean area under the curve (AUC) was 104 +/- 33 ng* h/ml, with a range from 65 yo 169 ng* h/ml. No patient had unsatisfactorily low trough levels during the study. There was only a weak but significant (P < 0.05) correlation between dose per kg body weight and AUC and, as expected, an excellent correlation (r2 = 0.73, P < 0.001) between AUC and trough level.
CONCLUSION: Because of interindividual variation between patients, therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is mandatory. In this study, a daily dose of 0.15 mg/kg was sufficient in most patients. We recommend the performance of at least one pharmacokinetic study after establishing stable FK 506 trough levels to ascertain a safe profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9269646     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/12.8.1668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  16 in total

1.  Measurement of saliva tacrolimus levels in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Vladimir Belostotsky; Jo Adaway; Brian G Keevil; Dena R Cohen; Nicholas J A Webb
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in stable paediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Tania Claeys; Maria Van Dyck; Rita Van Damme-Lombaerts
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  Review article: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease treatment.

Authors:  E G Quetglas; A Armuzzi; S Wigge; G Fiorino; L Barnscheid; M Froelich; Silvio Danese
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Cytochrome P450 3A: ontogeny and drug disposition.

Authors:  S N de Wildt; G L Kearns; J S Leeder; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  María del Mar Fernández De Gatta; Dolores Santos-Buelga; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; María José García
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  The influence of comedication on tacrolimus blood concentration in patients subjected to kidney transplantation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Neven Vavic; Nemanja Rancic; Viktorija Dragojevic-Simic; Biljana Draskovic-Pavlovic; Dubravko Bokonjic; Ljiljana Ignjatovic; Momir Mikov
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  Afsana Jahan; Ratna Prabha; Swasti Chaturvedi; Binu Mathew; Denise Fleming; Indira Agarwal
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in paediatric and adult patients.

Authors:  P E Wallemacq; R K Verbeeck
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Evaluation of tacrolimus abbreviated area-under-the-curve monitoring in renal transplant patients who are potentially at risk for adverse events.

Authors:  Yuen Yi Hon; Christine E Chamberlain; David E Kleiner; Michael S Ring; Douglas A Hale; Allan D Kirk; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  The transplanted child: New immunosuppressive agents and the need for pharmacokinetic monitoring.

Authors:  Guido Filler; Janusz Feber
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.