Literature DB >> 9268959

Exercise mode and gender comparisons of energy expenditure at self-selected intensities.

L Kravitz1, R A Robergs, V H Heyward, D R Wagner, K Powers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare oxygen consumption (VO2) and energy expenditure after 20 min of self-selected submaximal exercise for four modes of exercise. Eighteen subjects (9 male and 9 female) first completed a test of VO2max during treadmill running. On separate days, subjects then completed 20 min submaximal treadmill running (TR), simulated cross-country skiing (XC), cycle ergometry (CE), and aerobic riding (AR) exercise. Total VO2 and energy expenditure were significantly higher for TR than all other modes for both males and females (43.6 +/- 10.4, 39.1 +/- 9.7, 36.1 +/- 7.6, 28.4 +/- 6.1 LO2, for TR, XC, CE, and AR, respectively, P < 0.0001). For males and females, heart rate was similar during TR and XC and lower during CE and AR (154.8 +/- 14.2, 152 +/- 13.1, 143.4 +/- 14.9, and 126.2 +/- 12.0 beats.min-1 for TR, XC, CE, and AR, respectively, P < 0.0001). Compared with females, males had significantly greater VO2 (P < 0.005) and energy expenditure (P < 0.004), while females had higher heart rates (P < 0.003). Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were not different between TR, XC, and CE, but were significantly lower during AR (13.4 +/- 1.3, 13.6 +/- 0.8, 13.2 +/- 0.9, and 12.6 +/- 1.0 for TR, XC, CE, and AR, respectively, P < 0.003). TR elicited the greatest VO2 and energy expenditure during self-selected exercise despite and RPE similar to XC and CE. Therefore, treadmill exercise may be the modality of choice for individuals seeking to improve cardiorespiratory endurance and expend a larger number of kjoules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268959     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199708000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

Review 1.  The physiology of the highly trained female endurance runner.

Authors:  M Burrows; S Bird
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Time to exhaustion at maximal lactate steady state is similar for cycling and running in moderately trained subjects.

Authors:  Piero Fontana; Urs Boutellier; Claudia Knöpfli-Lenzin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry.

Authors:  Mathew Hill; Christopher Talbot; Michael Puddiford; Michael Price
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes.

Authors:  Gregoire P Millet; V E Vleck; D J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Overall and differentiated ratings of perceived exertion at the respiratory compensation threshold: effects of gender and mode.

Authors:  J M Green; T R Crews; A M Bosak; W W Peveler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Overall and peripheral ratings of perceived exertion during a graded exercise test to volitional exhaustion in individuals of high and low fitness.

Authors:  James Faulkner; Roger Eston
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Differences in oxygen uptake but equivalent energy expenditure between a brief bout of cycling and running.

Authors:  Christopher B Scott; Nathanael D Littlefield; Jeffrey D Chason; Michael P Bunker; Elizabeth M Asselin
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 4.169

8.  Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Christopher Scott
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Physiological responses and exercise preference between the Trikke and the bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  Eddie T C Lam; Kenneth Sparks; Michele A Barton-Verdi; Allison Lowe; Davon Jones; Edmond C Lam
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.103

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.