Literature DB >> 9268887

Image processing assessment of femoral osteopenia.

R L Lee1, J E Dacre, M F James.   

Abstract

Visual assessment of femoral osteopenia (the radiographic presentation of osteoporosis) is unreliable. Many of the short-comings of observer grading can be overcome by digital image analysis. Our group has developed algorithms to make automatic assessment of osteopenia from clinical radiographs. Texture Analysis Models (TA) commonly used in image analysis were investigated as measures of osteopenia. Unlike densitometric methods, TA characterizes properties of the structure of the image (ie, trabecular patterns). A group of women were analyzed whose subjects ranged from those at risk of osteoporosis (n = 24) to normal (n = 40). Using an IBM PC, frame-grabber, camera, and light-box, we appraised five statistical TA algorithms for assessment of the femoral neck in standard pelvic radiographs: (1) Fractal Signature (FS) describes the image's fractal nature. (2) Auto-Correlation of unaltered and Sobel Edge Transformed images (ACSE) measures image spatial self-similarity. (3) Co-occurrence Matrices (CM) gives the joint probability of greylevels with distance/direction and describes statistical relationships of image variation. (4) Textural Spectrum (TS) neighborhood pixel relationships measure regional directional and pixel-inversion properties. (5) Eular Numbers (EN) describe texture by properties (such as connectivity) of binary images. Good reproducibility from repeated analysis of radiographs was shown using both paired t-tests and Altman-Bland's methods. We have shown a correlation between femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD-the "gold standard" of osteoporosis assessment) and textural measures for all five algorithms. Significant measures of osteopenia were: ACSE (r = 0.6, P < .001), CM (r = -0.69, P < .001), FS (r = 0.35, P < .01), TS (r = 0.52, P < .001) and EN (r = -0.39, P < .01). Relationships were also found between textural characteristics and age/weight. TA techniques characterize the radiographic changes of bone in osteoporosis. Technology based on these ideas may have a place alongside BMD measurements in the assessment of this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268887      PMCID: PMC3452841          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  The bone "quality" problem.

Authors:  S Wallach; J D Feinblatt; J H Carstens; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  A robust and accurate method for calculating the fractal signature of texture in macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  J A Lynch; D J Hawkes; J C Buckland-Wright
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun

3.  A new method for automatic recognition of the radiographic trabecular pattern.

Authors:  W G Geraets; P F Van der Stelt; C J Netelenbos; P J Elders
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Singh; A R Nagrath; P S Maini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 5.284

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi; Aleš Fidler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Identification of hip fracture patients from radiographs using Fourier analysis of the trabecular structure: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jennifer S Gregory; Alison Stewart; Peter E Undrill; David M Reid; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Quantitative evaluation of midpalatal suture maturation via fractal analysis.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Kwak; Seong Sik Kim; Yong-Il Kim; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.