Literature DB >> 9268471

Use of visual cover by domestic fowl: a Venetian blind effect?

.   

Abstract

Cover is a structural feature of the environment that animals can use to conceal themselves from predators or conspecifics or to gain shelter from inclement weather. Cover may also form a physical barrier limiting movement. It was hypothesized that domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticuswould use visual cover for concealment. Use of cover was examined in two strains of domestic fowl kept indoors in four groups of 110-112 birds each. In each pen, cover was provided by four rigid vertical panels, one in each of four quadrants. Four similar quadrants were without cover. To investigate use of cover for concealment, the four cover structures varied in continuity of visual cover: (1) transparent (0% cover), (2) transparent with four equidistant vertical green stripes (33% cover), (3) transparent with eight such stripes (67% cover) and (4) solid green (100% cover). Scan samples of quadrant use were made weekly when the birds were 24-52 days of age. Both strains of domestic fowl (1) used areas with cover more than areas without cover, (2) showed increased resting and preening behaviour in areas with cover and (3) showed increased use of cover as continuity increased from 0 to 67%. These results could not be explained by thermoregulatory or physical barrier effects of the cover structures. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that a preference for concealment motivates the use of visual cover by domestic fowl, and suggest a 'Venetian blind' effect for visually discontinuous security cover.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268471     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  3 in total

1.  Analyzing the proximity to cover in a landscape of fear: a new approach applied to fine-scale habitat use by rabbits facing feral cat predation on Kerguelen archipelago.

Authors:  Pierrick Blanchard; Christine Lauzeral; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; Nigel G Yoccoz; Dominique Pontier
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Environmental Complexity: Additional Human Visual Contact Reduced Meat Chickens' Fear of Humans and Physical Items Altered Pecking Behavior.

Authors:  Peta S Taylor; Paul H Hemsworth; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Environmental complexity: A buffer against stress in the domestic chick.

Authors:  Irene Campderrich; Franco Nicolas Nazar; Anette Wichman; Raul Hector Marin; Inma Estevez; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.