Literature DB >> 9267297

Establishing outpatient cholecystectomy as a hospital routine.

A J Voitk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of outpatient cholecystectomies done voluntarily by surgeons and to identify any "correctable" factors leading to hospital admission, also to reassess the outpatient cholecystectomy rate after correcting the identified factors.
DESIGN: A prospective analysis.
SETTING: A 256-bed non-teaching acute-care community hospital on the outskirts of a major urban centre, served by 4 general surgeons. PATIENTS: All 515 patients booked for elective cholecystectomy at the hospital between Apr. 1, 1994, and Mar. 31, 1996, inclusive. INTERVENTION: Elective outpatient cholecystectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A successful procedure without compromise of safety.
RESULTS: In the preliminary study, outpatient cholecystectomy was done in 75% of the patients. Variations in individual surgical practice, preoperative patient selection and inappropriate day surgery facilities were thought to be correctable factors leading to admission. After correction of the these factors (follow-up study), the rate of outpatient cholecystectomy rose to 95% (p < 0.001). Variations in individual surgical practice disappeared, and no patient required processing through inappropriate day surgery facilities. No patient suffered untoward effects from outpatient management.
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient cholecystectomy is a safe hospital routine for all elective procedures without selection. Voluntary acceptance of this routine leads to an initial 75% outpatient rate. Identifying and correcting modifiable factors led to a significant increase in the institutional outpatient rate, comparable to reported individual rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267297      PMCID: PMC3949934     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

1.  Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway.

Authors:  J F Calland; K Tanaka; E Foley; V E Bovbjerg; D W Markey; S Blome; J S Minasi; J B Hanks; M M Moore; J S Young; R S Jones; B D Schirmer; R B Adams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a "true" outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; J W Lin; M A Talamini; C J Yeo; D S Snyder; S D Parker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  At the cutting edge.

Authors:  J L Meakins
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Acute cholecystitis: video-laparoscopic versus traditional treatment.

Authors:  P C Amaral; E M Azaro Filho; M P Galvão-Neto; M F Fortes; E L Souza; R S Alcântra; J E Ettinger; A B Regis; M M Sousa; V M do Carmo; P A Santana; E Fahel
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Criteria and benchmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a free-standing ambulatory center.

Authors:  C R Voyles; K B Boyd
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: is it safe?--an egyptian experience.

Authors:  Mohamed I Seleem; Shawkat S Gerges; Khalid S Shreif; Ashref E Ahmed; Ahmed Ragab
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.485

7.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Athar Ali; Tabish Chawla; Abid Jamal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.407

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.