Literature DB >> 9266644

Adhesion formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

V L Vader1, D M Vogt, K A Zucker, J P Thilstead, M J Curet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair controversy exists concerning the most appropriate repair method and implant material to use if intraabdominal adhesions are to be minimized.
METHODS: In 108 pigs, we implanted three different types of mesh by both the TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal) and Onlay (prosthesis placed directly upon the peritoneum) methods. Specimens were harvested in three time periods and adhesion formation was compared.
RESULTS: Average adhesions at 3 days were TAPP 18% and Onlay 49% (p < 0.001). At 3 weeks average adhesions were TAPP 8% and Onlay 23% (p < 0.04). Three-month figures were TAPP 1% and Onlay 13% (p < 0.001). In contrast, there were no differences in adhesion formation due to material type in any of the three time periods (all p > 0.17).
CONCLUSIONS: A peritoneal covering over a laparoscopic inguinal implant significantly reduced adhesions. Prosthetic material type did not affect adhesion formation in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9266644     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  3 in total

1.  Deepithelialization of a complex ventral hernia for completely extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  S A Bartsich; M H Schwartz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Adhesions and adhesiolysis: the role of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen M Kavic; Suzanne M Kavic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kathleen Lockhart; Douglas Dunn; Shawn Teo; Jessica Y Ng; Manvinder Dhillon; Edward Teo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.