Literature DB >> 9265876

Spanking by parents and subsequent antisocial behavior of children.

M A Straus1, D B Sugarman, J Giles-Sims.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To deal with the causal relationship between corporal punishment and antisocial behavior (ASB) by considering the level of ASB of the child at the start of the study.
METHODS: Data from interviews with a national sample of 807 mothers of children aged 6 to 9 years in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-Child Supplement. Analysis of variance was used to test the hypothesis that when parents use corporal punishment to correct ASB, it increases subsequent ASB. The analysis controlled for the level of ASB at the start of the study, family socio-economic status, sex of the child, and the extent to which the home provided emotional support and cognitive stimulation.
RESULTS: Forty-four percent of the mothers reported spanking their children during the week prior to the study and they spanked them an average of 2.1 times that week. The more spanking at the start of the period, the higher the level of ASB 2 years later. The change is unlikely to be owing to the child's tendency toward ASB or to confounding with demographic characteristics or with parental deficiency in other key aspects of socialization because those variables were statistically controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: When parents use corporal punishment to reduce ASB, the long-term effect tends to be the opposite. The findings suggest that if parents replace corporal punishment by nonviolent modes of discipline, it could reduce the risk of ASB among children and reduce the level of violence in American society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9265876     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170450011002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  27 in total

Review 1.  The physical punishment of children.

Authors:  D Elliman; M A Lynch
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Physical punishment of children: lessons from 20 years of research.

Authors:  Joan Durrant; Ron Ensom
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Legislation on smacking.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-20

4.  Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert E Larzelere; Brett R Kuhn
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-03

5.  Associations between childhood abuse and interpersonal aggression and suicide attempt among U.S. adults in a national study.

Authors:  Thomas C Harford; Hsiao-ye Yi; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2014-03-21

6.  Effective discipline for children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Gershoff; Andrew Grogan-Kaylor
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07

8.  Do nonphysical punishments reduce antisocial behavior more than spanking? a comparison using the strongest previous causal evidence against spanking.

Authors:  Robert E Larzelere; Ronald B Cox; Gail L Smith
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Reduced prefrontal cortical gray matter volume in young adults exposed to harsh corporal punishment.

Authors:  Akemi Tomoda; Hanako Suzuki; Keren Rabi; Yi-Shin Sheu; Ann Polcari; Martin H Teicher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Parenting attitudes and infant spanking: the influence of childhood experiences.

Authors:  Esther K Chung; Leny Mathew; Amy C Rothkopf; Irma T Elo; James C Coyne; Jennifer F Culhane
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.