Literature DB >> 9263849

A comparison of heuristic search algorithms for molecular docking.

D R Westhead1, D E Clark, C W Murray.   

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation and comparison of four heuristic search algorithms (genetic algorithm, evolutionary programming, simulated annealing and tabu search) and a random search procedure for flexible molecular docking. To our knowledge, this is the first application of the tabu search algorithm in this area. The algorithms are compared using a recently described fast molecular recognition potential function and a diverse set of five protein-ligand systems. Statistical analysis of the results indicates that overall the genetic algorithm performs best in terms of the median energy of the solutions located. However, tabu search shows a better performance in terms of locating solutions close to the crystallographic ligand conformation. These results suggest that a hybrid search algorithm may give superior results to any of the algorithms alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9263849     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007934310264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  31 in total

Review 1.  Ligand-protein docking and rational drug design.

Authors:  T P Lybrand
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 2.  Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock.

Authors:  D S Goodsell; G M Morris; A J Olson
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.137

3.  Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4.

Authors:  G M Morris; D S Goodsell; R Huey; A J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites.

Authors:  W Welch; J Ruppert; A N Jain
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1996-06

5.  Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  C M Oshiro; I D Kuntz; J S Dixon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Local elevation: a method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  T Huber; A E Torda; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  A R Leach
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  A comparison of methods for self-adaptation in evolutionary algorithms.

Authors:  N Saravanan; D B Fogel; K M Nelson
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Hydration in drug design. 2. Influence of local site surface shape on water binding.

Authors:  C S Poornima; P M Dean
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  11 in total

1.  The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase.

Authors:  C W Murray; C A Baxter; A D Frenkel
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes.

Authors:  G M Verkhivker; D Bouzida; D K Gehlhaar; P A Rejto; S Arthurs; A B Colson; S T Freer; V Larson; B A Luty; T Marrone; P W Rose
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Ligand-receptor docking with the Mining Minima optimizer.

Authors:  L David; R Luo; M K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A comparative docking study and the design of potentially selective MMP inhibitors.

Authors:  S Hanessian; N Moitessier; E Therrien
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases.

Authors:  T J Ewing; S Makino; A G Skillman; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.

Authors:  R D Taylor; P J Jewsbury; J W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  A comparison of various optimization algorithms of protein-ligand docking programs by fitness accuracy.

Authors:  Liyong Guo; Zhiqiang Yan; Xiliang Zheng; Liang Hu; Yongliang Yang; Jin Wang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 9.  Docking, virtual high throughput screening and in silico fragment-based drug design.

Authors:  Vincent Zoete; Aurélien Grosdidier; Olivier Michielin
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 10.  Targeting the C-Terminal Domain Small Phosphatase 1.

Authors:  Harikrishna Reddy Rallabandi; Palanivel Ganesan; Young Jun Kim
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.