Literature DB >> 9263375

Simple bioequivalence criteria: are they relevant to critical dose drugs? Experience gained from cyclosporine.

A Johnston1, P A Keown, D W Holt.   

Abstract

A critique of the current bioequivalence regulations is presented with reference to critical dose drugs. Using the development of a new cyclosporine formulation as an example, the deficiencies in current bioequivalence testing guidelines are examined and discussed. Based on the experience gained with cyclosporine, recommendations are made on how therapeutic equivalence, rather than just bioequivalence, should be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9263375     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-199708000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  8 in total

Review 1.  Generic antiarrhythmic drugs: what constitutes equivalency.

Authors:  D G Benditt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Differences in reference products: dissolution and in vivo evidence.

Authors:  I J McGilveray
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in Mexican paediatric renal transplant patients: role of CYP3A5 genotype and formulation.

Authors:  Carlos Orlando Jacobo-Cabral; Pilar García-Roca; Elba Margarita Romero-Tejeda; Herlinda Reyes; Mara Medeiros; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  A J Coukell; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cyclosporin therapeutic drug monitoring--an established service revisited.

Authors:  Raymond G Morris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2003-05

Review 6.  Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Philip Belitsky; Ulrich Frei; John Horvath; Peter Hoyer; J Harold Helderman; Michael Oellerich; Stephen Pollard; Hany Riad; Paolo Rigotti; Paul Keown; Björn Nashan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Cyclosporine: A Commentary on Brand versus Generic Formulation Exchange.

Authors:  A K Singh; S S Narsipur
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-11-17

Review 8.  Equivalence and interchangeability of narrow therapeutic index drugs in organ transplantation.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.