Literature DB >> 9263181

Genetic effects on bone mass and turnover-relevance to black/white differences.

A M Parfitt1.   

Abstract

The mass of a bone is given by its volume and its apparent density--mass per unit external volume. Most measurements of so-called density are of mass incompletely normalized by some index of bone size. Genes control about 60% to 75% of the variance of peak bone mass/density and a much smaller proportion of the variance in rate of loss. Genetic influence on bone mass/density are mediated in large part by body size, bone size, and muscle mass. Most of the fifty-fold increase in bone mass from birth to maturity is due to bone growth, which is linked to muscle growth and bodily growth. Three-D apparent bone density in the vertebrae increases about 15% during the pubertal growth spurt. The genetic potential for bone accumulation can be frustrated by insufficient calcium intake, disruption of the calendar of puberty and inadequate physical activity. The growing skeleton is much more responsive than the mature skeleton to the osteotrophic effect of exercise, which is mediated by the detection of deviations from a target value for strain, and orchestration of cellular responses that restore the target value, processes collectively termed the mechanostat. Production of metaphyseal cancellous bone and growth in length are both linked to endochondral ossification, which is driven by growth plate cartilage cell proliferation. Production of diaphyseal cortical bone and growth in width are both linked to periosteal apposition, which is driven by osteoblast precursor proliferation. During adolescence trabeculae and cortices become thicker by net endosteal apposition, which increases apparent density. Two lines of evidence support a genetic basis for black/white differences in bone mass. First, the magnitude (10% to 40%) is incommensurate with known nongenetic factors. Second, the difference is already evident in the fetus and increases progressively during growth, especially in adolescence; the difference in peak bone mass persists throughout life. The genetic determination of bone mass is mediated by two classes of gene. The first regulates growth of the body, including muscles and bones, under the control of a master gene or set of genes whose products function as the sizostat. The second regulates the increase in apparent bone density in response to load bearing, under the control of a master gene or set of genes whose products function as the mechanostat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9263181     DOI: 10.1080/07315724.1997.10718693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr        ISSN: 0731-5724            Impact factor:   3.169


  11 in total

1.  The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific.

Authors:  S Bass; P D Delmas; G Pearce; E Hendrich; A Tabensky; E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Interaction between playing golf and HRT on vertebral bone properties in post-menopausal women measured by QCT.

Authors:  P Eser; J Cook; J Black; R Iles; R M Daly; R Ptasznik; S L Bass
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effect of soluble corn fiber supplementation for 1 year on bone metabolism in children, the MetA-bone trial: Rationale and design.

Authors:  C Palacios; M A Trak-Fellermeier; C M Pérez; F Huffman; Y Hernandez Suarez; Z Bursac; T B Gambon; C H Nakatsu; C M Weaver
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Racial differences in bone strength.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2007

5.  Dietary calcium requirements do not differ between Mexican-American boys and girls.

Authors:  Cristina Palacios; Berdine R Martin; George P McCabe; Linda McCabe; Munro Peacock; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism in relation to ethnicity: a cross-sectional survey in healthy adults.

Authors:  Rodrigo Moreno-Reyes; Yvon A Carpentier; Marleen Boelaert; Khadija El Moumni; Ghislaine Dufourny; Christine Bazelmans; Alain Levêque; Christine Gervy; Serge Goldman
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  Genetic markers for ancestry are correlated with body composition traits in older African Americans.

Authors:  J R Shaffer; C M Kammerer; D Reich; G McDonald; N Patterson; B Goodpaster; D C Bauer; J Li; A B Newman; J A Cauley; T B Harris; F Tylavsky; R E Ferrell; J M Zmuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  The effects of physical activity on the epiphyseal growth plates: a review of the literature on normal physiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Timothy A Mirtz; Judy P Chandler; Christina M Eyers
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 9.  Life-course approach to nutrition.

Authors:  P J Mitchell; C Cooper; B Dawson-Hughes; C M Gordon; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross-sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Alison Macintosh; Jonathan C K Wells; Tim J Cole; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.