Literature DB >> 9263068

Conception failure in swine: importance of the sex ratio of a female's birth litter and tests of other factors.

L C Drickamer1, R D Arthur, T L Rosenthal.   

Abstract

Failure of gilts and sows to conceive when they are mated is a potentially serious economic cost for swine producers. In Exp. 1, we determined that anogenital distance of newborn gilts is related to the proportion of males in the litter (P < .001). Gilts from litters with more males have larger anogenital distances (mean = 8.0 +/- .2 mm); those from litters with low proportions of males have smaller anogenital distances (mean = 5.7 +/- .1 mm). In Exp. 2, we examined the effect of birth litter sex ratio of sows and gilts on reproductive performance using a 13-yr database of breeding and litter data. Gilts that failed to become pregnant on the first breeding attempt came from litters with significantly higher proportions of males than gilts that successfully conceived on the first breeding attempt. Overall, female swine were significantly more likely to exhibit lower rates of successful breeding during their first four breeding attempts if they had been born in a male-biased litter. These results have implications for swine producers deciding which gilts to keep and which to market. Given the higher probability of reproductive problems for gilts from litters of 12 or more pigs with 67% or more males, these females should likely become market hogs. Sow's age, mode of insemination, and the number of insemination attempts at an estrus period, but not season, can affect successful breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9263068     DOI: 10.2527/1997.7582192x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Associations with four generations of divergent selection for age at puberty in swine.

Authors:  Garrett M See; Mark T Knauer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The phenotypic correlates and quantitative genetics of masculinization in the rodent, Octodon degus.

Authors:  D A Roff; M E Wolak; L A Correa; M Soto-Gamboa
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Anogenital distance reflects the sex ratio of a gilt's birth litter and predicts her reproductive success1.

Authors:  Jemma Seyfang; Cameron R Ralph; Michelle L Hebart; Alan J Tilbrook; Roy N Kirkwood
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Sex bias of the birth litter affects surge but not tonic LH secretion in gilts.

Authors:  Jemma Seyfang; Roy N Kirkwood; Alan J Tilbrook; Cameron R Ralph
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Associations among hypospadias, cryptorchidism, anogenital distance, and endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Michael H Hsieh; Benjamin N Breyer; Michael L Eisenberg; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Association of foetal size and sex with porcine foeto-maternal interface integrin expression.

Authors:  Claire Stenhouse; Charis O Hogg; Cheryl J Ashworth
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Androgens and environmental antiandrogens affect reproductive development and play behavior in the Sprague-Dawley rat.

Authors:  A K Hotchkiss; J S Ostby; J G Vandenburgh; L E Gray
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Developmental origins of pregnancy loss in the adult female common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Julienne N Rutherford; Victoria A deMartelly; Donna G Layne Colon; Corinna N Ross; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Male Fetal Biomarker INSL3 Reveals Substantial Hormone Exchange between Fetuses in Early Pig Gestation.

Authors:  Andreas Vernunft; Richard Ivell; Kee Heng; Ravinder Anand-Ivell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gene changes may minimize masculinizing and defeminizing influences of exposure to male cotwins in female callitrichine primates.

Authors:  Jeffrey A French; Brett Frye; Jon Cavanaugh; Dongren Ren; Aaryn C Mustoe; Lisa Rapaport; Jennifer Mickelberg
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.