Literature DB >> 9263062

The effects of sow parity on digestibility of proximate components and minerals during lactation as influenced by diet and microbial phytase supplementation.

P A Kemme1, J S Radcliffe, A W Jongbloed, Z Mroz.   

Abstract

Ninety-six (Finnish Landrace x Dutch Landrace) reproductive sows were used at parities 1, 3, 5, and 7 + 8 from d 107 of gestation to d 21 of lactation to investigate the effects of diet and parity on apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD). Animals were randomly assigned to one of four dietary treatments. Dietary treatments were 1) a P-deficient (1.1 g digestible P [dP]/kg) Dutch semipractical diet; 2) Diet 1 supplemented with 400 FTU Aspergillus niger phytase per kilogram of diet (1.7 g dP/kg); 3) a corn-soybean meal-based diet (1.3 g dP/kg); and 4) Diet 3 supplemented with extra monocalcium phosphate (MCP; 2.4 g dP/kg of diet). Animals were fed twice daily at 2.8 times maintenance (418 kJ ME/ BW75) from d 8 to the end of lactation. Feces and urine were collected during d 11 to 13 and d 18 to 20 of lactation. The ATTD of DM, OM, ash, CP, Ca, Mg, and total P (P < .01) were higher for the corn-soybean meal-based diets than for the Dutch semipractical diet not supplemented with phytase. Addition of MCP enhanced total P ATTD by an average of 6.7 percentage units. Addition of microbial phytase improved Ca, Mg, and total P ATTD, but the effects were dependent on the stage of lactation. Lower ATTD of OM and CP were seen for first parity animals compared with higher parity sows. The ATTD of Mg increased with increasing parity. Parity had little effect on the ATTD of minerals during lactation, and dietary effects were prominent and followed a similar trend to those seen in growing-finishing pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9263062     DOI: 10.2527/1997.7582147x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  2 in total

1.  Effect of high-phytase supplementation in lactation diets on sow and litter performance.

Authors:  Kelsey L Batson; Hilda I Calderón; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Joel M DeRouchey
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-15

2.  Poorer lifetime growth performance of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny is largely due to weight differences at birth and reduced growth in the preweaning period, and is not improved by progeny segregation after weaning.

Authors:  J R Craig; C L Collins; K L Bunter; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.