Literature DB >> 9262017

The development of field-emission scanning electron microscopy for imaging biological surfaces.

J Pawley1.   

Abstract

This article traces the important milestones in the development of high-resolution, field-emission, scanning electron microscopes (SEM). Such instruments are now capable of producing images of the surfaces of biological specimens that rival, in terms of resolution and contrast, those produced by conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Even though one of the first instruments to produce a useful transmission electron microscope image was, in fact, an early scanning microscope, TEM reached its full potential for biological imaging almost 30 years sooner than did SEM. The main reason for this slow rate of development is the dependence of any scanning technique on source brightness. The only suitable electron source was the field-emission source, originally developed in the 1930's. Making this into a stable and reliable electron source for microscopy required many technical barriers to be overcome. An additional delay may have been caused by the great success that attended the introduction of early SEM instruments. These instruments which employed heated, tungsten hairpin cathodes, were inexpensive and reliable, but they that were also far from optimal in terms of optical performance. Their market success may have engendered the sense of inertia and complacency that further delayed the introduction of low aberrations objective lenses and field-emission sources for almost 20 years after they were first introduced to electron microscopy. In addition, the fact that these early SEMs accustomed users to operating with a much higher beam voltage than was either necessary or wise, lead many to assume that the SEM was incapable of producing high-resolution images of biological surfaces. This left them open to fascination with newer ahd slower techniques that, on balance, were less suitable than optimized SEM for most of their imaging needs. In parallel to these developments in instrumentation, major improvements were also made in the way that the specimen surface was prepared before placing it into the vacuum and radiation environment of the microscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9262017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scanning        ISSN: 0161-0457            Impact factor:   1.932


  13 in total

1.  Two morphological types of cell appendages on a strongly adhesive bacterium, Acinetobacter sp. strain Tol 5.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Jun Koki; Hajime Unno; Katsutoshi Hori
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  New ultrastructural observations on the skeletal matrix of Tritrichomonas foetus.

Authors:  Marlene Benchimol
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Recent progress in histochemistry and cell biology: the state of the art 2005.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  Surface characteristics of isopod digestive gland epithelium studied by SEM.

Authors:  Agron Millaku; Vladka Leser; Damjana Drobne; Matjaz Godec; Matjaz Torkar; Monika Jenko; Marziale Milani; Francesco Tatti
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  Improvement on the visualization of cytoskeletal structures of protozoan parasites using high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM).

Authors:  Celso Sant'Anna; Loraine Campanati; Catarina Gadelha; Daniela Lourenço; Letícia Labati-Terra; Joana Bittencourt-Silvestre; Marlene Benchimol; Narcisa Leal Cunha-e-Silva; Wanderley De Souza
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Coaggregation facilitates interspecies hydrogen transfer between Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Tomoyuki Kosaka; Katsutoshi Hori; Yasuaki Hotta; Kazuya Watanabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Firm but slippery attachment of Deinococcus geothermalis.

Authors:  M Kolari; U Schmidt; E Kuismanen; M S Salkinoja-Salonen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Nanotechnology: toxicologic pathology.

Authors:  Ann F Hubbs; Linda M Sargent; Dale W Porter; Tina M Sager; Bean T Chen; David G Frazer; Vincent Castranova; Krishnan Sriram; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Steven H Reynolds; Lori A Battelli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Walter McKinney; Kara L Fluharty; Robert R Mercer
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.902

9.  Novel pegylated silver coated carbon nanotubes kill Salmonella but they are non-toxic to eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Atul A Chaudhari; Shanese L Jasper; Ejovwoke Dosunmu; Michael E Miller; Robert D Arnold; Shree R Singh; Shreekumar Pillai
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 10.  Overview about the localization of nanoparticles in tissue and cellular context by different imaging techniques.

Authors:  Anja Ostrowski; Daniel Nordmeyer; Alexander Boreham; Cornelia Holzhausen; Lars Mundhenk; Christina Graf; Martina C Meinke; Annika Vogt; Sabrina Hadam; Jürgen Lademann; Eckart Rühl; Ulrike Alexiev; Achim D Gruber
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.