Literature DB >> 9261865

Accuracy and precision of NMR relaxation experiments and MD simulations for characterizing protein dynamics.

M Philippopoulos1, A M Mandel, A G Palmer, C Lim.   

Abstract

Model-free parameters obtained from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations commonly are used to describe the intramolecular dynamical properties of proteins. To assess the relative accuracy and precision of experimental and simulated model-free parameters, three independent data sets derived from backbone 15N NMR relaxation experiments and two independent data sets derived from MD simulations of Escherichia-coli ribonuclease HI are compared. The widths of the distributions of the differences between the order parameters for pairs of NMR data sets are congruent with the uncertainties derived from statistical analyses of individual data sets; thus, current protocols for analyzing NMR data encapsulate random uncertainties appropriately. Large differences in order parameters for certain residues are attributed to systematic differences between samples for intralaboratory comparisons and unknown, possibly magnetic field-dependent, experimental effects for interlaboratory comparisons. The widths of distributions of the differences between the order parameters for two NMR sets are similar to widths of distributions for an NMR and an MD set or for two MD sets. The linear correlations between the order parameters for an MD set and an NMR set are within the range of correlations observed between pairs of NMR sets. These comparisons suggest that the NMR and MD generalized order parameters for the backbone amide N-H bond vectors are of comparable accuracy for residues exhibiting motions on a fast time scale (< 100 ps). Large discrepancies between NMR and MD order parameters for certain residues are attributed to the occurrence of "rare" motional events over the simulation trajectories, the disruption of an element of secondary structure in one of the simulations, and lack of consensus among the experimental data sets. Consequently, (easily detectable) severe distortions of local protein structure and infrequent motional events in MD simulations appear to be the most serious artifacts affecting the accuracy and precision, respectively, of MD order parameters relative to NMR values. In addition, MD order parameters for motions on a fast (< 100 ps) timescale are more precisely determined than their NMR counterparts, thereby permitting more detailed dynamic characterization of biologically important residues by MD simulation than is sometimes possible by experimental methods. Proteins 28:481-493, 1997.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9261865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  15 in total

1.  Key interactions in the immunoglobulin-like structure of apo-neocarzinostatin: evidence from nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation data and molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  N Izadi-Pruneyre; Y Blouquit; J Perez; P Minard; M Desmadril; J Mispelter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Motions and structural variability within toxins: implication for their use as scaffolds for protein engineering.

Authors:  Bernard Gilquin; Marjorie Bourgoin; Renée Ménez; Marie-Hélène Le Du; Denis Servent; Sophie Zinn-Justin; André Ménez
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Molecular dynamics study of substance P peptides in a biphasic membrane mimic.

Authors:  T Wymore; T C Wong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme.

Authors:  Matthias Buck; Sabine Bouguet-Bonnet; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Model-free analysis for large proteins at high magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  Shou-Lin Chang; Andrew P Hinck; Rieko Ishima
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Protein conformational flexibility prediction using machine learning.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Keri Siggers; Burkhard Rost; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Comparison of multiple crystal structures with NMR data for engrailed homeodomain.

Authors:  Tomasz L Religa
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 8.  An overview of recent developments in the interpretation and prediction of fast internal protein dynamics.

Authors:  Gabrielle Nodet; Daniel Abergel
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.733

9.  Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of TEM beta-lactamase: dynamics and water binding of the omega-loop.

Authors:  Fabian Bös; Jürgen Pleiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  A direct coupling between global and internal motions in a single domain protein? MD investigation of extreme scenarios.

Authors:  Mehdi Bagheri Hamaneh; Liqun Zhang; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.