Literature DB >> 9261687

In vivo biocompatibility and biostability of modified polyurethanes.

A B Mathur1, T O Collier, W J Kao, M Wiggins, M A Schubert, A Hiltner, J M Anderson.   

Abstract

Modified segmented polyurethanes were examined for biostability and biocompatibility using an in vivo cage implant system for time intervals of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 weeks. Two types of materials were used: polyether polyurethanes and polycarbonate polyurethanes. Two unmodified polyether polyurethanes (PEUU A' and SPU-PRM), one PDMS endcapped polyether polyurethane (SPU-S), and two polycarbonate polyurethanes (SPU-PCU and SPU-C) were investigated in this study. Techniques used to characterize untreated materials were dynamic water contact angle, stress-strain analysis, and gel permeation chromatography. Cellular response was measured by exudate analysis and by macrophage and foreign body giant cell (FBGC) densities. Material characterization, postimplantation, was done by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) in order to quantify biodegradation and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to qualitatively describe the cellular response and biodegradation. The exudate analysis showed that the acute and chronic inflammatory responses for all materials were similar. Lower FBGC densities and cell coverage on SPU-S were attributed to the hydrophobic surface provided by the PDMS endgroups. The polycarbonate polyurethanes did not show any significant differences in cell coverage or FBGC densities even though the macrophage densities were slightly lower compared to polyether polyurethanes. By 10 weeks, biodegradation in the case of PEUU A' and SPU-PRM was extensive as compared to SPU-S because the PDMS endcaps of SPU-S provided a shield against the oxygen radicals secreted by macrophages and FBGCs and lowered the rate of biodegradation. In the case of polycarbonate polyurethanes, the oxidative stability of the carbonate linkage lowered the rate of biodegradation tremendously as compared to the polyether polyurethanes (including SPU-S). The minor amount of biodegradation seen in polycarbonate polyurethanes at 10 weeks was attributed to hydrolysis of the carbonate linkage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9261687     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199708)36:2<246::aid-jbm14>3.0.co;2-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  24 in total

1.  CD47-dependent molecular mechanisms of blood outgrowth endothelial cell attachment on cholesterol-modified polyurethane.

Authors:  Masako Ueda; Ivan S Alferiev; Stacey B Simons; Robert P Hebbel; Robert J Levy; Stanley J Stachelek
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Biocompatibility of microplates for culturing epithelial renal cells evaluated by a microcalorimetric technique.

Authors:  Y Xie; J W DePierre; L Nässberger
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Analiz Rodriguez; David T Chang
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 11.130

4.  Evaluation of the biodurability of polyurethane-covered stent using a flow phantom.

Authors:  D H Kim; S G Kang; J R Choi; J N Byun; Y C Kim; Y M Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Anti-inflammatory polymeric coatings for implantable biomaterials and devices.

Authors:  Amanda W Bridges; Andrés J García
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 6.  Tissue-engineered heart valve: future of cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Radoslaw A Rippel; Hossein Ghanbari; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Angiographic analysis for phantom simulations of endovascular aneurysm treatments with a new fully retrievable asymmetric flow diverter.

Authors:  Aradhana Yoganand; Rachel P Wood; Carlos Jimenez; Adnan Siddiqui; Kenneth Snyder; S V Setlur Nagesh; D R Bednarek; S Rudin; Robert Baier; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-17

Review 8.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Synthesis and characterisation of enhanced barrier polyurethane for encapsulation of implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Nima Roohpour; Jaroslaw M Wasikiewicz; Deepen Paul; Pankaj Vadgama; Ihtesham U Rehman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  In vivo cytokine-associated responses to biomaterials.

Authors:  Robert J Schutte; Lola Xie; Bruce Klitzman; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.