BACKGROUND/AIM: Three hundred and eighty-seven patients surgically treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma were assessed by a multivariate analysis and the factors influencing incidence and extension of metachronous liver metastases studied. METHODOLOGY: A series of 387 patients which had been surgically treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma between January 1980 to December 1990 and followed-up over a minimum of a 5-year period was retrospectively studied. RESULTS: The most reliable prognostic markers are represented by tumor site (p < 0.05) and, more specifically, by wall infiltration (p < 0.01) and metastatic lymph-nodes (p < 0.05). The only independent variable with a significant impact on stage of metachronous liver metastases was proved to be the depth of wall infiltration (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the reliability of some indicators of primary tumor in influencing incidence, but not extension, of metachronous liver metastases and this is the main problem when it comes to using prognostic factors in order to modulate the intervals of postoperative follow-up according to risk category.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Three hundred and eighty-seven patients surgically treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma were assessed by a multivariate analysis and the factors influencing incidence and extension of metachronous liver metastases studied. METHODOLOGY: A series of 387 patients which had been surgically treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma between January 1980 to December 1990 and followed-up over a minimum of a 5-year period was retrospectively studied. RESULTS: The most reliable prognostic markers are represented by tumor site (p < 0.05) and, more specifically, by wall infiltration (p < 0.01) and metastatic lymph-nodes (p < 0.05). The only independent variable with a significant impact on stage of metachronous liver metastases was proved to be the depth of wall infiltration (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the reliability of some indicators of primary tumor in influencing incidence, but not extension, of metachronous liver metastases and this is the main problem when it comes to using prognostic factors in order to modulate the intervals of postoperative follow-up according to risk category.
Authors: Marjaneh Taghavi; Stefano Trebeschi; Rita Simões; David B Meek; Rianne C J Beckers; Doenja M J Lambregts; Cornelis Verhoef; Janneke B Houwers; Uulke A van der Heide; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Monique Maas Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-01