Literature DB >> 9259233

Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants.

A L Miller1, D J Morris, B E Pfingst.   

Abstract

Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order were examined using psychophysical studies of electrical detection thresholds in nonhuman primates. Subjects were trained using acoustic stimuli, then deafened in one ear and implanted with an electrode array for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Threshold vs pulse separation functions for trains of biphasic electrical pulses were compared for constant and alternating leading phase polarity. When leading phase polarity was held constant, threshold vs pulse separation functions were nonmonotonic (U-shaped). Small polarity-dependent (cathodic vs anodic leading phase) differences in absolute thresholds were observed at long pulse separations, but function shape was independent of leading phase. When leading phase polarity alternated, there was a pronounced reduction in thresholds at short pulse separations (below about 1 ms), resulting in monotonically increasing threshold vs pulse separation functions. At long pulse separations, functions for alternating and constant polarity stimuli were similar. Polarity effects were most apparent for longer duration trains (20 pulses) at long pulse durations (1-2 ms/phase). For stimuli consisting of only two biphasic pulses, alternating polarity effects depended on whether cathodic or anodic phases were adjacent. The neural mechanisms underlying these effects probably include refractory properties and/or residual potentials.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9259233     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00037-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

2.  Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Steven M Bierer; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A dual-process integrator-resonator model of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-13

4.  Morphometric classification and spatial organization of spiral ganglion neurons in the human cochlea: consequences for single fiber response to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T Potrusil; C Wenger; R Glueckert; A Schrott-Fischer; F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.

Authors:  Shuman He; Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Ruijie Wang; Chloe Vaughan; Jianfen Luo; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.