Literature DB >> 9259056

Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse.

J Bahr1, H Klingler, W Panzer, H Rode, D Kettler.   

Abstract

American Heart Association as well as European Resuscitation Council require the carotid pulse check to determine pulselessness in an unconscious victim and to decide whether or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be initiated. Recent studies on the ability of health professionals to check the carotid pulse have called this diagnostic tool in question and led to discussions. To contribute to this discussion we performed a study to evaluate skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. A group of 449 volunteers (most had participated in a first aid course) were asked to check the carotid pulse in a young healthy, non-obese person by counting aloud the detected pulse rate. Time intervals until correct detection of the carotid pulse were registered. Overall the volunteers needed an average of 9.46 s, ranging from 1 to 70 s. Only 47.4% of the volunteers were able to detect a pulse within 5 s, and 73.7% within 10 s. A level of 95% volunteers detecting the pulse correctly was reached only after 35 s. Based on these findings we conclude that the intervals established for carotid pulse check may be too short and that perhaps the value of pulse check within in the scope of CPR needs to be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9259056     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  20 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Revised guidelines are more evidence based.

Authors:  A S Lockey; J P Nolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

2.  [Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council 2000 on advanced adult life support. A statement of the Advanced Life Support Working Group as approved by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation Council].

Authors: 
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Resuscitation.

Authors:  Richard Vincent
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  [Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council 2000 for basic pediatric life support. A statement of the Pediatric Life Support Working Group following approval by the executive committee of the European Resuscitation Council].

Authors: 
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Wanis H Ibrahim
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  General medicine and surgery for dental practitioners: part 2. Medical emergencies in dental practice: the drug box, equipment and basic principles of management.

Authors:  M Greenwood; J G Meechan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  [Current recommendations for basic/advanced life support : Addressing unanswered questions and future prospects].

Authors:  K Fink; B Schmid; H-J Busch
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Handheld Doppler to improve pulse checks during resuscitation of putative pulseless electrical activity arrest.

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Rachel J Lampert; Ernest I Mandel; Jessica Feinleib; Zhaodi Gong; Shyoko Honiden
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.