Literature DB >> 9258774

Reluctance of paramedics and emergency medical technicians to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

P Hew1, B Brenner, J Kaufman.   

Abstract

Recently, a reluctance of lay and medical personnel to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation (MMR) in hospital and community settings has been documented, with 45% of respondents declining to perform MMR on a stranger. In the present study, we examined whether the perceived risk and fear of contracting infectious diseases diminishes the willingness of paramedics and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to perform MMR. Seventy-seven EMTs and 27 paramedics responded to a questionnaire, administered by one of two physicians, containing mock cardiac arrest scenarios that were designed to assess willingness to perform MMR as a citizen responder. Faced with a situation in which an adult stranger required MMR, 57% of the participating EMTs and all of the paramedics stated that they would refuse to perform MMR. None of the paramedics and only 32.5% of the EMTs stated that they would perform MMR on a man in a gay neighborhood. In addition, 23% of the EMTs and 37% of the paramedics indicated that they would refuse to perform MMR on a child. White respondents were more willing than nonwhite respondents to perform MMR. Twenty-nine percent of the prehospital-care providers had been in situations requiring MMR in the community, and 40% either had walked away or did only external compression. Of those participating paramedics and EMTs who had performed MMR in emergency situations, only 45% indicated that they would do so again. The respondents indicated that they would not be willing to administer MMR because of the fear of contracting infectious agents, especially the human immunodeficiency virus. Despite the proven effectiveness of MMR in saving lives, paramedics and EMTs are highly reluctant to perform MMR as citizen responders. Their perceived risks of contracting infectious agents during MMR are high, despite the low actual risks. We recommend that instruction in cardiopulmonary resuscitation for providers of pre-hospital care, the medical community, and the general public should emphasize the benefits of providing MMR, the actual low risks of contracting infectious diseases during administration of MMR, and the use of widely available and effective barrier masks to minimize any risks due to administration of MMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258774     DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00006-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  11 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out of hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-07

2.  Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - Would You Do It?

Authors:  Liew Su-May
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2006-08-31

Review 3.  Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Marc D Berg; Stephen M Schexnayder; Leon Chameides; Mark Terry; Aaron Donoghue; Robert W Hickey; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Marc D Berg; Stephen M Schexnayder; Leon Chameides; Mark Terry; Aaron Donoghue; Robert W Hickey; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Emergency department evaluations of non-percutaneous blood or body fluid exposures during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Jeremy B Katzen; Kenneth H Mayer; Bruce M Becker
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.040

6.  Retrospective study into the delivery of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation to "999" callers.

Authors:  A Heward; R T Donohoe; M Whitbread
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial.

Authors:  Jonghwan Shin; Seong Youn Hwang; Hui Jai Lee; Chang Je Park; Yong Joon Kim; Yeong Ju Son; Ji Seon Seo; Jin Joo Kim; Jung Eun Lee; In Mo Lee; Bong Yeun Koh; Sung Gi Hong
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Attitudes to basic life support among medical students following the 2003 SARS outbreak in Hong Kong.

Authors:  N D Caves; M G Irwin
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators.

Authors:  Rudolph W Koster; Michael A Baubin; Leo L Bossaert; Antonio Caballero; Pascal Cassan; Maaret Castrén; Cristina Granja; Anthony J Handley; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Gavin D Perkins; Violetta Raffay; Claudio Sandroni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Single Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Results in Better Neurological Outcomes in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Yong Won Kim; Hyung Il Kim; Sung Oh Hwang; Yoon Seop Kim; Gyo Jin An; Kyoung Chul Cha
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.