Literature DB >> 9258067

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Nagoya experience.

Y Ono1, N Katoh, T Kinukawa, O Matsuura, S Ohshima.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for removing kidneys with small volume renal cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 patients (19 men and 6 women, mean age 59) who had a kidney with small volume renal cell carcinoma (diameter less than 5 cm.), underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The kidney was dissected laparoscopically together with the adrenal gland, perirenal fatty tissue and Gerota's fascia. In 11 patients, we used the transperitoneal approach and in the remaining 14 we used the retroperitoneal approach, in which a working space is created by finger and balloon dissection. We maneuvered the kidney into the laparoscopy sack, which was then removed through an additional 5 to 6 cm. incision.
RESULTS: All 25 kidneys were removed successfully. Mean operation time was 5.3 hours and mean estimated blood loss was 335 ml. There were 5 complications, including a patient who suffered an injury to the duodenum, which was treated by open duodenojejunostomy. Full convalescence occurred at an average 23 days. No metastatic disease, no local recurrence and no seeding at the port sites occurred during the followup of 7 to 49 months (mean, 22 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is recommended as a minimally invasive procedure for removing kidneys with small volume renal cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: technical issues and outcome.

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Constantinos Constantinidis; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Surgical Technique for Retroperitoneoscopic Nephrectomy: A case report.

Authors:  Shahid Aquil; Joseph K Mathew; Krishna Prasad V; Khalid Rehman; Omar W Sharef; Ghalib Al Baadi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2009-12-19

Review 3.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 4.  Taking the side of transperitoneal access for surgery in upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Sam B Bhayani; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.862

5.  Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy and Radical Nephrectomy for Treating Small Renal Cell Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Hongfeng Shen; Ruisha Tu; Wei Li; Geng He; Wei Huang; Zhenchang Qin; Chongfeng Wang; Shuyong Yu
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 6.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for advanced kidney cancer.

Authors:  Stephen E Pautler; McClellan M Walther
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.