Literature DB >> 9257763

Pharmacokinetics of isepamicin following a single administration by intravenous infusion or intramuscular injections.

E Radwanski1, V Batra, M Cayen, C Korduba, D Cutler, M Affrime, A Nomeir, C C Lin.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of isepamicin following administration of a 1-g dose were evaluated for 18 healthy male volunteers between the ages of 26 and 38. In a randomized crossover fashion, each volunteer received doses of isepamicin by a 30-min intravenous infusion and as an intramuscular injection. Blood samples were collected at specified times after dosing and assayed for isepamicin by a validated radioimmunoassay method. The individual plasma concentration-time curves were analyzed by noncompartmental methods. In general, the pharmacokinetics after intravenous infusion and intramuscular injection were similar. As expected, the maximum concentration of isepamicin in serum following intramuscular injection (37.2 microg/ml) was lower than the observed concentration at the end of infusion (66.7 microg/ml). The areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 h to infinity following intramuscular and intravenous administration were 164.8 and 154.5 microg x hr/ml, respectively, indicating complete absorption following intramuscular administration. The respective mean terminal-phase half-life (t1/2) values were 2.6 and 3.6 h. Although t1/2 was slightly longer following intravenous infusion, the small difference in the observed t1/2 values was not considered to be clinically significant. Total body clearances following intramuscular injection and intravenous infusion were 1.3 and 1.4 ml/min/kg, respectively, which were similar to renal serum creatinine clearances in healthy volunteers (> 1.14 ml/min/kg). The drug was safe and well tolerated. The results of the present study clearly show complete absorption of isepamicin following intramuscular administration. The similarity in the pharmacokinetics after intravenous infusion and intramuscular dosing would permit interchangeable administration of isepamicin by either route without compromising clinical efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9257763      PMCID: PMC164007     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  5 in total

1.  Considerations in comparing intravenous and intramuscular antibiotics.

Authors:  G Milkovich; C J Piazza
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.544

2.  1-N HAPA gentamicin B, a new aminoglycoside active against gentamicin resistant isolates--activity compared to other aminoglycosides.

Authors:  H C Neu; K P Fu
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics from first-exposure down-regulation.

Authors:  G L Daikos; G G Jackson; V T Lolans; D M Livermore
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  Considering product features and costs in selecting a system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.

Authors:  R P Rapp
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1987-11

5.  Appearance of amikacin and tobramycin resistance due to 4'-aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase [ANT(4')-II] in gram-negative pathogens.

Authors:  G A Jacoby; M J Blaser; P Santanam; H Hächler; F H Kayser; R S Hare; G H Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  A mechanistic approach for the scaling of clearance in children.

Authors:  Andrea N Edginton; Walter Schmitt; Barbara Voith; Stefan Willmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of isepamicin.

Authors:  M Tod; C Padoin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Jing-Fen Jin; Ling-Ling Zhu; Meng Chen; Hui-Min Xu; Hua-Fen Wang; Xiu-Qin Feng; Xiu-Ping Zhu; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.711

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.