Literature DB >> 9257445

False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.

G Gerbier1, B Garin-Bastuji, R Pouillot, P Véry, C Cau, V Berr, B Dufour, F Moutou.   

Abstract

To investigate the epidemiology of false positive serological reactions (FPSR) in bovine brucellosis, 1259 bovines from 20 herds were sampled on three successive occasions during the winter of 1993-1994 in an area where the herd prevalence rate of FPSR was high. Serum samples were examined by classical brucellosis serological tests (Rose Bengal and complement fixation) and faeces were cultured for the presence of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Thirty-nine bovines expressed at least one positive serological reaction during the study. In the herds with FPSR during the 1993-1994 annual brucellosis surveillance campaign, the specificity of the brucellosis serological tests varied significantly from December to March (97.0% to 99.1%). Y enterocolitica O:9 was isolated from 42 bovines but only three of them showed a positive serological response during the study. Y enterocolitica O:9 isolation rates also decreased with time. Young animals and animals having demonstrated FPSR in the past had a greater risk of having a FPSR. Older animals, which rarely showed FPSR, could form a reservoir for Y enterocolitica O:9. While isolation of Y enterocolitica O:9 was not linked to presence of FPSR and conversely, the FPSR phenomenon should be considered, either at the herd level or at the individual level. This work reinforces the link, at least partial, between FPSR and infection by Y enterocolitica O:9.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9257445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  5 in total

1.  Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  Raúl C Mainar-Jaime; Pilar M Muñoz; María J de Miguel; María J Grilló; Clara M Marín; Ignacio Moriyón; José M Blasco
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Fatal case of brucellosis misdiagnosed in early stages of Brucella suis infection in a 46-year-old patient with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  M Carrington; U Choe; S Ubillos; D Stanek; M Campbell; L Wansbrough; P Lee; G Churchwell; K Rosas; S R Zaki; C Drew; C D Paddock; M Deleon-Carnes; M Guerra; A R Hoffmaster; R V Tiller; B K De
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  P M Muñoz; C M Marín; D Monreal; D González; B Garin-Bastuji; R Díaz; R C Mainar-Jaime; I Moriyón; J M Blasco
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-01

4.  The Tip of Brucella O-Polysaccharide Is a Potent Epitope in Response to Brucellosis Infection and Enables Short Synthetic Antigens to Be Superior Diagnostic Reagents.

Authors:  Lucy Duncombe; Laurence Howells; Anna Haughey; Andrew V Taylor; Daryan Kaveh; Sevil Erdenliğ Gϋrbilek; Anne Dell; Paul G Hitchen; Stuart M Haslam; Satadru Sekhar Mandal; N Vijaya Ganesh; David R Bundle; John McGiven
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  A retrospective study (2007-2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa.

Authors:  Francis B Kolo; Abiodun A Adesiyun; Folorunso O Fasina; Andrew Potts; Banenat B Dogonyaro; Charles T Katsande; Henriette Van Heerden
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.