Literature DB >> 9257255

The alternate recipient list for heart transplantation: does it work?

H Laks1, F G Scholl, D C Drinkwater, A Blitz, M Hamilton, J Moriguchi, G Fonarow, J Kobashigawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One quarter of patients awaiting heart transplantation die while on the waiting list. This is largely due to the shortage of donor organs. The alternate recipient list was created to establish a means by which patients who would otherwise be turned down for heart transplantation solely because of age over 65 or a need for a third heart transplantation can receive organs considered marginal that may otherwise be wasted. The hope is that these patients may achieve improved survival with these substandard hearts than they would achieve with medical therapy alone.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients ages 47 to 71 years (mean 66.7 years) were listed on the alternate recipient list at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center from 1991 to 1996. Seventeen patients underwent heart transplantation from the alternate waiting list. The outcome of this group was compared with the outcome of a contemporaneous group of 266 patients ages 18 to 66 years (mean age 52.1 years) from the standard heart transplantation waiting list.
RESULTS: The early mortality rate for the patients in the alternate group was 11.8% (2/ 17). Actuarial survival from time of orthotopic heart transplantation at 6 months and 1 year was the same 74.5% at a mean follow-up was 13.4 months. In comparison, the early mortality rate for the patients on the standard list was 5.6% (15/266), and actuarial survival at 6 months and 1 year was 86.8% and 83.1%, respectively (mean follow-up was 30 months). There was no significant difference in early mortality rate or actuarial survival between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The alternate recipient list for heart transplantation is a valid and ethical option for patients who would otherwise be denied heart transplantation. It provides these patients with similar early and medium-term outcomes in comparison to patients on the standard list, and organs that may otherwise be wasted are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9257255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  8 in total

Review 1.  Heart transplantation: approaching a new century.

Authors:  B Radovancević; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Disparities in heart and lung transplantation.

Authors:  Wayne Tsuang; Rola Khedraki; Eileen Hsich
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.269

3.  Matching high-risk recipients with marginal donor hearts is a clinically effective strategy.

Authors:  Mark J Russo; Ryan R Davies; Kimberly N Hong; Jonathan M Chen; Michael Argenziano; Alan Moskowitz; Deborah D Ascheim; Isaac George; Allan S Stewart; Mathew Williams; Annetine Gelijns; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Preoperative assessment of high-risk candidates to predict survival after heart transplantation.

Authors:  P Christian Schulze; Jeffrey Jiang; Jonathan Yang; Faisal H Cheema; Kenneth Schaeffle; Tomoko S Kato; Maryjane Farr; Susan Restaino; Mario Deng; Mathew Maurer; Evelyn Horn; Farhana Latif; Paolo C Colombo; Ulrich Jorde; Nir Uriel; Jennifer Haythe; Rachel Bijou; Ron Drusin; Sun Hi Lee; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Ten-year experience with extended criteria cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Marc D Samsky; Chetan B Patel; Ashleigh Owen; Phillip J Schulte; Jacob Jentzer; Paul B Rosenberg; G Michael Felker; Carmelo A Milano; Adrian F Hernandez; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 6.  Advances in the understanding and management of heart transplantation.

Authors:  Dhssraj Singh; David O Taylor
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2015-05-12

Review 7.  Targeting the Innate Immune Response to Improve Cardiac Graft Recovery after Heart Transplantation: Implications for the Donation after Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Stefano Toldo; Mohammed Quader; Fadi N Salloum; Eleonora Mezzaroma; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  [Evaluation of the potential organ donor with special regards to heart donation].

Authors:  Daniel Höfer; Arezu Aliabadi; Christian Ebner; Christoph Hörmann; Stephane Mahr; Regina Mascherbauer; Gerhard Pölzl; Albert Reiter; Andrä Wasler; Thomas Weber; Michael Zink; Andreas Zuckermann; Herwig Antretter
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 1.704

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.