Literature DB >> 9256854

Effect of the National Resident Assessment Instrument on selected health conditions and problems.

B E Fries1, C Hawes, J N Morris, C D Phillips, V Mor, P S Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the implementation of the National Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) system on selected conditions representing outcomes for nursing home residents.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, pre-/post-design, with assessments at baseline and 6-month follow-up. SAMPLE: Two thousand one hundred twenty-eight residents from 268 nursing homes in 10 states before RAI implementation, and 2,088 from 254 of the same nursing homes after implementation. MEASURES: From the full RAI Minimum Data Set, measures of dehydration, falls, decubitus, vision problems, stasis ulcer, pain, dental status (poor teeth), and malnutrition were examined at baseline and 6 months later. Poor nutrition was evaluated using a body mass index score below 20 and vision using a 4-level scale; other conditions were represented by their presence or absence. Decline and improvement were computed as the changes in level between baseline and follow-up, limiting the sample to those who could manifest each such change. MAIN
RESULTS: Of eight health conditions representing poorer health status, dehydration and stasis ulcer had significantly lower prevalence after the implementation of the RAI (1993) compared with 1990. At the same time, there was an increase in the prevalence of daily pain. Fewer residents declined over 6 months in nutrition and vision after implementation. Although for these two conditions there were also significantly reduced rates of improvement, the net was an overall reduction in the 6-month rate of decline for all residents. Pain also demonstrated a decline in the postimplementation rate of improvement. The combined eight conditions showed reductions in the rates of both decline and improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Several outcomes for nursing home residents improved after implementation of the RAI. Of the four conditions for which there are significant declines in prevalence or outcome changes, three are specifically addressed in the care planning guidelines incorporated the RAI system (all except stasis ulcer, although there is a RAP for decubitus ulcer). Pain, the only other condition with a significant result --an increase in baseline prevalence--also has no RAP. Although the changes might be ascribed otherwise, they support the premise that the RAI has directly contributed to improved outcomes for nursing home residents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256854     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  31 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of quality systems in nursing homes: a review.

Authors:  C Wagner; G van der Wal; P P Groenewegen; D H de Bakker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  The drive for quality care in US nursing homes in the era of the prospective payment system.

Authors:  Carmel M Hughes; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Strengthening research to improve the practice and management of long-term care.

Authors:  Penny Hollander Feldman; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Translating evidence-based falls prevention into clinical practice in nursing facilities: Results and lessons from a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Anna Schenck; Joel Gorospe; Jill McArdle; Lee Dobson; Cindy Deporter; Eleanor McConnell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  OBRA 1987 and the quality of nursing home care.

Authors:  Virender Kumar; Edward C Norton; William E Encinosa
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2006-03

6.  National release of the nursing home quality report cards: implications of statistical methodology for risk adjustment.

Authors:  Yue Li; Xueya Cai; Laurent G Glance; William D Spector; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Nutritional assessment of residents in long-term care facilities (LTCFs): recommendations of the task force on nutrition and ageing of the IAGG European region and the IANA.

Authors:  A Salva; L Coll-Planas; S Bruce; L De Groot; S Andrieu; G Abellan; B Vellas; Sandrine Andrieu; Luisa Bartorelli; Ytshal N Berner; Stuart Bruce; Bruno Corman; Alex Domingo; Thomas P Egger; Lisette de Groot; Yves Guigoz; Ana Imedio; Mercè Planas; Concha Porras; Joan Carles Rovira; Antoni Salvà; José Antonio Serra; Bruno Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  [Resident assessment instrument in Switzerland. History, results and experiences from the application].

Authors:  Markus Anliker; Guido Bartelt
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  The impact of social networks on knowledge transfer in long-term care facilities: Protocol for a study.

Authors:  Anne E Sales; Carole A Estabrooks; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Study protocol for the translating research in elder care (TREC): building context - an organizational monitoring program in long-term care project (project one).

Authors:  Carole A Estabrooks; Janet E Squires; Greta G Cummings; Gary F Teare; Peter G Norton
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.