Literature DB >> 9256844

Clinical trial participant satisfaction: survey of SHEP enrollees. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program.

E B Schron1, S Wassertheil-Smoller, S Pressel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine older persons' reasons for joining a clinical trial, and to provide data that could be useful in planning and carrying out clinical trials in older and minority populations.
DESIGN: A survey. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 4281 men and women 60 years of age or older who were randomized to the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). MEASUREMENTS: A 10-item satisfaction/attitude questionnaire was designed to evaluate (1) what personal benefits people expect from participation in this trial, (2) motivation for joining, and (3) satisfaction with clinic staff and operations. Each question had a response category asking for a measure of agreement, satisfaction, or importance.
RESULTS: The most important reasons for joining the clinical trial were to contribute to science (96%), improve the health of others (96%), and improve their own health (93%). Free medical care and social aspects were less important reasons to join. There were no differences by treatment assignment, but differences in reasons for joining SHEP by age, race, gender, and education were observed.
CONCLUSION: Older adults were enthusiastic about clinical trial participation. Recruitment, participant management strategies, and allocation of resources should consider the needs of specific patient groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256844     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02962.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  11 in total

1.  Primary prevention studies and the healthy elderly: evaluating barriers to recruitment.

Authors:  M Boles; W S Getchell; G Feldman; R McBride; R G Hart
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-08

2.  Disparate inclusion of older adults in clinical trials: priorities and opportunities for policy and practice change.

Authors:  Angelica P Herrera; Shedra Amy Snipes; Denae W King; Isabel Torres-Vigil; Daniel S Goldberg; Armin D Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Formative research in clinical trial development: attitudes of patients with arthritis in enhancing prevention trials.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Jeremy Sugarman; David S Pisetsky; Joan Bathon
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Factors influencing the participation of older people in clinical trials - data analysis from the MAVIS trial.

Authors:  P Fearn; A Avenell; S McCann; A C Milne; G Maclennan
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Featherstone; J L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

Review 6.  How to get older people included in clinical studies.

Authors:  Miles D Witham; Marion E T McMurdo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  The acceptability and impact of a randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: qualitative study.

Authors:  Suzanne Moffatt; Joan Mackintosh; Martin White; Denise Howel; Adam Sandell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Patients' perspectives and motivators to participate in clinical trials with novel therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  G Udrea; B Dumitrescu; M Purcarea; I Balan; E Rezus; D Deculescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun

9.  Disappointment and adherence among parents of newborns allocated to the control group: a qualitative study of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sandra Meinich Petersen; Vibeke Zoffmann; Jesper Kjærgaard; Lone Graff Stensballe; Lone Graff Steensballe; Gorm Greisen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action.

Authors:  Bethann Mangel Pflugeisen; Stacie Rebar; Anne Reedy; Roslyn Pierce; Paul J Amoroso
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.