Literature DB >> 9256159

Characterization of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line with acquired resistance to the bisdioxopiperazine dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerase II.

B B Hasinoff1, T I Kuschak, A M Creighton, C L Fattman, W P Allan, P Thampatty, J C Yalowich.   

Abstract

A Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line highly resistant to the non-cleavable complex-forming topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane (ICRF-187, Zinecard) was selected. The resistant cell line (DZR) was 1500-fold resistant (IC50 = 2800 vs 1.8 microM) to continuous dexrazoxane exposure. DZR cells were also cross-resistant (8- to 500-fold) to other bisdioxopiperazines (ICRF-193, ICRF-154, and ICRF-186), and somewhat cross-resistant (4- to 14-fold) to anthracyclines (daunorubicin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, and idarubicin) and etoposide (8.5-fold), but not to the other non-cleavable complex-forming topoisomerase II inhibitors suramin and merbarone. The cytotoxicity of dexrazoxane to both cell lines was unchanged in the presence of the membrane-active agent verapamil. DZR cells were 9-fold resistant to dexrazoxane-mediated inhibition of topoisomerase II DNA decatenation activity compared with CHO cells (IC50 = 400 vs 45 microM), but were only 1.4-fold (IC50 = 110 vs 83 microM) resistant to etoposide. DZR cells contained one-half the level of topoisomerase II protein compared with parental CHO cells. However, the specific activity for decatenation using nuclear extract topoisomerase II was unchanged. Etoposide (100 microM)-induced topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in DZR cells and isolated nuclei were similarly one-half the level found in CHO cells and in isolated nuclei. However, the ability of 500 microM dexrazoxane to inhibit etoposide (100 microM)-induced topoisomerase II-DNA covalent complexes was reduced 4- to 6-fold in both DZR cells and nuclei compared with CHO cells and nuclei. In contrast, there was no differential ability of aclarubicin or merbarone to inhibit etoposide-induced topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in CHO compared with DZR cells and isolated nuclei. It was concluded that the DZR cell line acquired its resistance to dexrazoxane mainly through an alteration in the topoisomerase II target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256159     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00013-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  6 in total

1.  Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a novel series of anthrapyrazoles linked with netropsin-like oligopyrrole carboxamides as anticancer agents.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Xing Wu; Lynn J Guziec; Frank S Guziec; Gaik-Lean Chee; Jack C Yalowich; Brian B Hasinoff
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a novel series of bisintercalating DNA-binding piperazine-linked bisanthrapyrazole compounds as anticancer agents.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Xing Wu; Jack C Yalowich; Brian B Hasinoff
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Inhibition of topoisomerase II α activity and induction of apoptosis in mammalian cells by semi-synthetic andrographolide analogues.

Authors:  Jintapat Nateewattana; Rungnapha Saeeng; Sakkasem Kasemsook; Kanoknetr Suksen; Suman Dutta; Surawat Jariyawat; Arthit Chairoungdua; Apichart Suksamrarn; Pawinee Piyachaturawat
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Structure of the topoisomerase II ATPase region and its mechanism of inhibition by the chemotherapeutic agent ICRF-187.

Authors:  Scott Classen; Stephane Olland; James M Berger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Resveratrol: A novel type of topoisomerase II inhibitor.

Authors:  Joyce H Lee; Timothy J Wendorff; James M Berger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The effect of the catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) on CC9C10 hybridoma viability and productivity.

Authors:  N Barnabé; M Butler; B B Hasinoff
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.058

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.