A R Bontempo1, J Rapp. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, College of Optometry 10010, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the mechanism of protein-lipid interactions responsible for biofilm formation on the surface of hydrophilic contact lenses in vitro. METHODS: New, never-worn hydrophilic contact lenses were individually incubated in a protein-only, lipid-only, or combination protein-lipid artificial tear solution for 24 hours at 37 degrees C with constant stirring. Deposited lipids were removed with a methanol based extraction procedure, separated using high-performance, thin layer chromatography and quantitatively analyzed densitometrically. Deposited proteins were extracted with 4M urea, separated using gel electrophoresis and quantitatively analyzed densitometrically. RESULTS: The presence of protein in the artificial tear solution has a profound effect on the nature of lipid deposition for each group of hydrophilic lens, whereas the presence of lipid has a significant effect on the nature of protein deposition for only a group IV lens. In addition, the presence of lipid deposits on a group IV lens decreases the adsorption of lysozyme, while the presence of protein deposits reduces the amount of total lipid adhering to a group II lens. CONCLUSIONS: Protein adsorption on a group IV lens renders the lens surface less hydrophilic and, thereby, more susceptible to lipid deposition, which in turn increases surface hydrophobicity and inhibits additional protein deposition. For a group II lens, positively charged protein competes with and replaces some of the polar lipids attached to the lens. Thus, the interaction of protein and lipid on a lens surface most prone to a particular contaminant apparently makes it less likely for that contaminant to bind.
PURPOSE: To investigate the mechanism of protein-lipid interactions responsible for biofilm formation on the surface of hydrophilic contact lenses in vitro. METHODS: New, never-worn hydrophilic contact lenses were individually incubated in a protein-only, lipid-only, or combination protein-lipid artificial tear solution for 24 hours at 37 degrees C with constant stirring. Deposited lipids were removed with a methanol based extraction procedure, separated using high-performance, thin layer chromatography and quantitatively analyzed densitometrically. Deposited proteins were extracted with 4M urea, separated using gel electrophoresis and quantitatively analyzed densitometrically. RESULTS: The presence of protein in the artificial tear solution has a profound effect on the nature of lipid deposition for each group of hydrophilic lens, whereas the presence of lipid has a significant effect on the nature of protein deposition for only a group IV lens. In addition, the presence of lipid deposits on a group IV lens decreases the adsorption of lysozyme, while the presence of protein deposits reduces the amount of total lipid adhering to a group II lens. CONCLUSIONS: Protein adsorption on a group IV lens renders the lens surface less hydrophilic and, thereby, more susceptible to lipid deposition, which in turn increases surface hydrophobicity and inhibits additional protein deposition. For a group II lens, positively charged protein competes with and replaces some of the polar lipids attached to the lens. Thus, the interaction of protein and lipid on a lens surface most prone to a particular contaminant apparently makes it less likely for that contaminant to bind.
Authors: Kari B Green-Church; Igor Butovich; Mark Willcox; Douglas Borchman; Friedrich Paulsen; Stefano Barabino; Ben J Glasgow Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Daniel R Powell; Mirunalni Thangavelu; Heather L Chandler; Kelly K Nichols; Jason J Nichols Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Holly Lorentz; Miriam Heynen; Lise M M Kay; Claudia Yvette Dominici; Warda Khan; Wendy W S Ng; Lyndon Jones Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2011-12-24 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Zhenjun Zhao; Xiaojia Wei; Yulina Aliwarga; Nicole A Carnt; Qian Garrett; Mark D P Willcox Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 2.367