Literature DB >> 9255217

The not-so-good old days: working with pituitary growth hormone in North America, 1956 to 1985.

S D Frasier1.   

Abstract

Before 1985 the use of growth hormone (GH) was governed by a philosophy of scarcity and conservation of resources. Between 1956 and 1959 human pituitary GH was shown to be effective. The competition for gland collection and extraction that followed benefited only certain patients with motivated parents and only a few investigators. To maximize gland collection, the distribution of GH for clinical investigation, and the number of patients who could be treated, the National Institutes of Health and the College of American Pathologists formed the National Pituitary Agency (NPA). In Canada a similar program was developed by the Canadian Medical Research Council. For more than 20 years the NPA supervised most of the GH treatment in the United States. Commercial pituitary GH entered the U.S. market in 1976, and competition soon appeared. Patients treated through the NPA were subjects in clinical studies for part of the first year of treatment, after which the limited availability of GH dictated treatment for only part of the year and caps on final heights. By 1984 treatment was year round and the height caps largely unenforced. In the last year of its distribution NPA GH was used in 2450 patients in the United States and commercial pituitary GH was used in 600 to 800; slightly more than 300 patients were being treated in Canada. And then, in 1985, came Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease. While the not-so-good old days are gone and need not be lamented, there remains virtue in a conservative therapeutic philosophy. If anything can be learned from the use of pituitary GH in children, it is a healthy respect for the law of unintended consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9255217     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70001-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

Review 1.  Brief review and commentary: diagnosis of pediatric pituitary disorders.

Authors:  John Ching; Phillip D K Lee
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Mice with gene alterations in the GH and IGF family.

Authors:  Yanrong Qian; Darlene E Berryman; Reetobrata Basu; Edward O List; Shigeru Okada; Jonathan A Young; Elizabeth A Jensen; Stephen R C Bell; Prateek Kulkarni; Silvana Duran-Ortiz; Patricia Mora-Criollo; Samuel C Mathes; Alison L Brittain; Mat Buchman; Emily Davis; Kevin R Funk; Jolie Bogart; Diego Ibarra; Isaac Mendez-Gibson; Julie Slyby; Joseph Terry; John J Kopchick
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Growth hormone - past, present and future.

Authors:  Michael B Ranke; Jan M Wit
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Managing idiopathic short stature: role of somatropin (rDNA origin) for injection.

Authors:  J Paul Frindik; Stephen F Kemp
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-06-24

5.  History of growth hormone therapy.

Authors:  Vageesh S Ayyar
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-09

Review 6.  Emerging options in growth hormone therapy: an update.

Authors:  Stephen F Kemp; J Paul Frindik
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Somatotropin in the treatment of growth hormone deficiency and Turner syndrome in pediatric patients: a review.

Authors:  Christina Southern Reh; Mitchell E Geffner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-01

Review 8.  Human Growth and Growth Hormone: From Antiquity to the Recominant Age to the Future.

Authors:  Evan Graber; Edward O Reiter; Alan D Rogol
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.