Literature DB >> 9254926

Confidence intervals of evolutionary distances between sequences and comparison with usual approaches including the bootstrap method.

G Andrieu1, G Caraux, O Gascuel.   

Abstract

Two methods are commonly employed for evaluating the extent of the uncertainty of evolutionary distances between sequences: either some estimator of the variance of the distance estimator, or the bootstrap method. However, both approaches can be misleading, particularly when the evolutionary distance is small. We propose using another statistical method which does not have the same defect: interval estimation. We show how confidence intervals may be constructed for the Jukes and Cantor (1969) and Kimura two-parameter (1980) estimators. We compare the exact confidence intervals thus obtained with the approximate intervals derived by the two previous methods, using artificial and biological data. The results show that the usual methods clearly underestimate the variability when the substitution rate is low and when sequences are short. Moreover, our analysis suggests that similar results may be expected for other evolutionary distance estimators.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9254926     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  2 in total

1.  Impact of sampling density on the extent of HIV clustering.

Authors:  Vlad Novitsky; Sikhulile Moyo; Quanhong Lei; Victor DeGruttola; Myron Essex
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  Phylodynamic analysis of HIV sub-epidemics in Mochudi, Botswana.

Authors:  Vlad Novitsky; Denise Kühnert; Sikhulile Moyo; Erik Widenfelt; Lillian Okui; M Essex
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.396

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.